In attempting to understand others, it is important to gain a perspective from which the third party views the world. Understanding the third party perspective is a way to formulating an effective way of persuading a change in that person, if that is the goal. Or, perhaps understanding X merely in order to accept the behavior or actions of the individual, is enough of a reason.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is often important to understand the perspective of one’s treating doctor in order to obtain the necessary support and administrative initiation of the medical provider.
From the doctor’s viewpoint, it is normally counter-productive in terms of treatment and therapy to declare, ascertain and deem that the patient is “totally disabled“. Work is therapeutic; it allows for a teleological motivation which compels continuation in recuperative and rehabilitative terms.
Further, when this “fact” is combined with the general exposure of most doctors to other forms of disability benefits — state or federal OWCP benefits; Social Security Disability benefits; private disability insurance benefits — and rarely an encounter with FERS or CSRS disability retirement issues, it becomes apparent why doctors often become reluctant and resistant to getting involved with the administrative process. OWCP benefits require an assertion of causality-to-employment; SSDI necessitates a declaration of “total disability”; private disability policies can often lead to depositions and legal responses.
Thus, everything that is counterintuitive to a doctor’s perspective of what is therapeutically beneficial to the patient, is potentially there when presented with a request for support in a disability retirement case.
Explanation is the key to understanding; effective explanation should persuade and alter a perspective founded upon a misinformed foundation. It is often necessary to explain the differences between FERS & CSRS disability retirement benefits and the “others” which have previously polluted the waters of a pristine stream of thought.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Doctor Tagged: | a common and visible scene: the doctor's perspective in disability claims, advising your treating doctor about your opm disability application, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, bear in mind the different actors and perspectives in an opm disability case, CSRS disability retirement, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, hesitancy in applying for fers deisability benefits, hesitation comes from unfamiliarity, how important is your physician's cooperation for a fers disability claim?, how to seek the support of your treating doctor, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, nationwide representation of federal employees, obtaining cooperation from family doctor, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, reasons that explain some doctors' hostility toward federal disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, securing cooperation from your doctors is very important for usps disability, the doctor's misconceptions about federal disability retirement, the opm disability application from the perspective of your physician, tips for dealing with your treating physician, USPS disability retirement, viewing your federal disability claim from the perspective of your physician, why physicians hesitate to help the postal worker?, why some doctors hesitate to "disable" a disabled federal worker?, why sometimes doctors won't cooperate with the disabled federal workers, your federal disability attorney can help to secure your physician's cooperation, your treating physician will not know much about opm disability laws