Whether the Federal Agency or the U.S. Postal Service has offered a legally-viable accommodation is determined by the criteria of an offer made which is either at the same pay or grade as the position one currently occupies; but, moreover, as the Bracey case and subsequent cases which elaborate upon the issue have made clear, it cannot be a position which is merely “made up” or temporary by nature, or one in which the current Supervisor merely whispers in one’s ear and says, “Just don’t do X, Y and Z essential elements of the job.”
The reasoning behind the view that such a temporary, modified “position” does not constitute an “accommodation” under the law — and therefore would not prevent eligibility for Federal Disability Retirement benefits — is easily justified by the age-old adage that, where one lives by the sword, one dies by the sword; meaning, thereby, that if Supervisor X can simply suspend certain essential elements of a job, a future Supervisor Y can just as easily reinstate the requirements of performing those previously-unattended elements, and require that they be performed.
That being said, there is nevertheless nothing wrong with an Agency allowing for a Federal or Postal worker to work at a position and lessen the requirements of the job. For some, it may be that such a modified position is acceptable, especially in light of receiving a regular paycheck.
The issue of “accommodations” should not be confused with the eligibility requirements of being able to file for, and be approved with, Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. There is the issue of legally-sufficient accommodation for purposes of preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefitsfrom the U.S. Office of Personnel Management; then, there is the commonplace parlance of being informally “accommodated” if one wants to continue to work; the two are not contradictory.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Accommodation and Light Duty, Federal Disability Judge-Made Decisions Quoted Tagged: | a common fallacy: I won't qualify for disability retirement if the federal agency accomodates me, accommodation of federal employees, civil service disability, disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement opm legal accommodation, essential elements of jobs, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, federal employee disability, federal employees and disability according to the law, FERS disability retirement, if reassignment is not possible for the light duty federal worker, ineffective accommodation in the federal workplace, injuries in the federal workplace and unreasonable accommodations, injury compensation and light limited duty, legal accommodation for Postal workers, legal accommodation under fers disability rules, legal representation for injured federal workers, light duty and accommodation before opm disability retirement, light duty and accommodation of federal agencies, light duty and reasonable accommodation, light duty in the Postal Service, limited duty and accommodation of disabled federal employees, medical retirement from the federal government even with accommodation?, minor job adjustments are not accommodations under fers disability law, no real accommodation efforts for most disabled employees, opm critical essential element, OPM disability application tips and strategies, OPM disability retirement, Post Office disability, post office light duty, Postal disability, questions about accommodation and federal employee disability, real accommodation and rehabilitation efforts in the federal sector, reasonable accommodation of federal workers, the employing agency's understanding of legal accommodation and light duty, the medical condition and the essential elements of job connection, the tricky issue of accommodation in the federal workplace, us attorney defending the rights of light duty postal workers, usps accommodation, USPS disability retirement benefits, usps light duty is usually not real accommodation under opm disability rules, why in opm disability law most accommodations are not accommodations, why most us postal accommodations are only half-hearted accommodations