Posted on September 19, 2008 by federallawyer
I often receive telephone calls from Federal and Postal employees worried about what their Supervisor will write in the SF 3112B (Supervisor’s Statement) — the lies, half-truths, and vindictive statements that some Supervisors will, for whatever reason, attempt to have that “last parting shot”. Such acts by supervisors are, for the most part, and fortunately, [...]
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Agency, OPM Disability Actors - The Supervisor, OPM Disability Application - SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement for CSRS and FERS, U.S. Postal Service (USPS) Disability Retirement | Tagged: disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement for federal employees, disability retirement with the federal government, emotional distress at the Post Office, federal owcp, federal disability retirement, federal employee disability doctor, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, FERS medical retirement, harassment is not a medical issue, hostile work environment for federal workers, hostile work environment in the Post Office, if the supervisors tells lies in the opm disability application, injured postal worker, medical evidence, medical reports in the OPM disability retirement application, medical retirement for employees in small us agencies, nationwide representation of federal employees, no light duty jobs in the usps with the recession, OPM disability, OPM disability application tips and strategies, OWCP benefits for federal workers, Post Office disability, Postal Service disability, Postal supervisors and managers, postal worker's injury, pragmatic methodology, representing federal employees in and outside the country, requirements for federal disability retirement, rhode island opm federal disability retirement, SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement, shame, supervisor's statements and defamation, the applicant's and the agency's legal arguments over opm disability, the applicant's methodology, the medical condition in fers disability retirement, the revenge of a postal supervisor, the venom of the supervisor, USPS disability retirement, usps workers with medical limitations, your treating doctors | 2 Comments »
Posted on March 20, 2008 by federallawyer
Some have asked me whether acceptance of a temporary light duty assignment is of concern in a disability retirement application. If you look at SF 3112B (Supervisor’s Statement), Section E(3), the question is whether the employee has “been reassigned to ‘light duty’ or a temporary position?
If the Supervisor answers “No”, then of course there is [...]
Filed under: Accommodation and Light Duty, OPM Disability Actors - The Agency, OPM Disability Actors - The Supervisor, OPM Disability Application - SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement for CSRS and FERS, OPM Disability Application - SF 3112D Agency Certification of Reassignment and Accommodation Efforts for CSRS and FERS | Tagged: accommodation of federal employees, Bracey v. Office of Personnel Management, civil service disability, civil service disability retirement, disability retirement for federal employees, disability retirement opm, duty status report, essential elements of jobs, federal employee disability, federal injured ill workers, FERS medical retirement, filing for OPM disability retirement, injury compensation and light limited duty, job reassignment, light duty, light duty in the Postal Service, limited duty, limited duty postal service, limited jobs for light duty employees, National Reassessment Process (NRP), Offer of Modified Assignment (Limited Duty) PS Form 2499X, opm disability for federal workers in alabama, postal office disability, Postal Service disability, SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement, temporary duties or assignment, temporary position, the Bracey case on fers disability retirement, usps disability benefits, usps fers retirement, usps limited duty jobs | Leave a Comment »
Posted on March 20, 2008 by federallawyer
I am often asked my opinion on the impact a Supervisor’s Statement has upon a disability retirement application. Unfortunately, not all supervisor’s are created equal — and, while in theory, a supervisor should be completely professional in filling out the SF 3112B — meaning that the supervisor should answer the questions in an ‘objective’ manner [...]
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Supervisor, OPM Disability Application - SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement for CSRS and FERS | Tagged: civil service disability, CSRS disability retirement, doctor's statements of disability, federal disability retirement, federal employees disability, federal medical retirement, federal workers disability, FERS disability retirement, FERS medical retirement, harassment is not a medical issue, how to write a persuasive statement on disability, injured light limited duty supervisor or 204b, Justice Department employees disability benefits, OPM Disability Application, opm disability for federal employees in louisiana, opm disability retirement is a medical not an eeoc issue, OPM medical retirement, physician's statements in an OPM disability case, Post Office disability, Postal Service disability, Postal supervisors and managers, SF 3112B Supervisor’s Statement, strong and irrefutable medical evidence, supervisors' revenge against Postal workers, the venom of the supervisor, USPS Disability | Leave a Comment »
