To prove one’s eligibility for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, is seemingly an uncomplicated matter.
As one’s medical condition impacts the ability to perform one or more of the essential element of one’s job, it is up to the treating doctor to establish the nexus and provide an opinion as to the connecting bridge between the medical condition and the positional requirements of one’s Federal or Postal job.
How does one do that? Must it be comprised of a 1-to-1 ratio between job elements and medical conditions? How important and prominent are “symptoms” considered, as opposed to the mere clinical declaration of the diagnosis, in persuading the U.S. Office of Personnel Management that a particular medical condition should qualify for Federal Disability Retirement benefits? To what extent is one’s own statement of disability, as described on Standard Form 3112A, important in establishing the foothold towards gaining an approval from OPM?
Also, what algorithm or comparative analysis does OPM use in evaluating a case, and how does one enhance the chances of success at the First Stage of the process? If denied at the First Stage of the Federal Disability Retirement process, does the basis of the denial (often characterized by a plethora of multiple reasons given) require a point-by-point refutation, and is the Reconsideration Division at OPM using the same standard of review, or a different application of laws in evaluating the additional evidence submitted at the next stage?
If one watches a gymnast, a ballerina, or even a mathematician at work in solving or unraveling a complex problem or exercise, one is immediately struck by the ease with which the feat is performed. But it is almost always the unseen preparation which has preceded the actual performance that sets the stage of an uncomplicated presentation.
It is that mystery of the uncomplicated, which tends to trip us all, and that is no different in the preparation, formulation and submission of a Federal Disability Retirement application, applied through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether you are under FERS or CSRS.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Burden of Proof | Tagged: a better methodology to get your opm disability claim approved, an easy form and the complex statutory criteria of opm disability law, an overall winning approach to the whole opm disability process, being eligible versus proving eligibility in opm disability retirement law and practice, civil service disability, complex issues to take care of in preparing a federal disability application, complex strategies behind simple-looking fers disability forms, considering the fact that standard forms don't explain what you must prove in order to become eligible for benefits, criteria needed to prove federal employee disability, disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement for federal employees, don't let your federal agency rush you through a complex disability process, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement application and process, federal disability retirement lawyer, fers disability standard forms won't show the legal criteria you need to meet to prove your case, how to prove a federal employee disability claim, keep your opm disability application simple unless you got several issues, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, lawyer federal retirement disability, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm disability retirement forms don't explain how the opm defines a disability, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, simplifying an otherwise complex federal disability application, simplifying the complexities of a federal disability claim, taking a long view approach towards the opm disability process, taking a pragmatic approach to fers disability retirement, the art of simplifying a complex fers disability retirement process, the complex medical and especially legal terminology hiding those connections and definitions you need to prove in a federal disability retirement claim, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the simplicity of an inherently complex disability process under fers or csrs, the simplification of an inherently complex process in csrs disability, USPS disability retirement, when you should keep your fers disability application simple and to the point | Leave a comment »