Because the term “accommodations” is rarely understood in its technical and legal sense, there is often the danger of a Federal or Postal employee who is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS to “shoot one’s self in the foot” in the very use of the term — or in checking certain boxes on the application form (specifically, SF 3112A, Applicant’s Statement of Disability), and further, there is the added danger that the Agency, in completing a Supervisor’s Statement or the SF 3112D, will mis-apply and mis-state the import, significance or relevance of any actions taken in attempting to assist the Federal or Postal employee.
Indeed, in a Supervisor’s Statement (SF 3112B) there are many instances in which the Supervisor completing the form will contradict him/herself when it comes to the issue of accommodations. Moreover, the applicant him/herself will often mis-state the issue of accommodations on SF 3112A.
The term “accommodations” has a very narrow definition, and must be used and applied to the advantage of the Federal or Postal employee who is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS. Additionally, it is not out of the realm of possibilities that the Office of Personnel Management also (whether deliberately or by chance) uses the very misuse (by the Applicant) of the term to its advantage. In all cases, the term “accommodations” must be used and referred to carefully, technically, and with full insight of all of its consequences in the use or misuse of the word.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Accommodation and Light Duty, Reflections | Tagged: a common fallacy: I won't qualify for disability retirement if the federal agency accomodates me, accommodation efforts in the 3112a, accommodation under OPM disability law, blogs owcp and opm disability issues, civil service disability, CSRS disability retirement, disability retirement for postal workers under limited duty, disability retirement opm legal accommodation, excessing light duty from post office, federal disability law blog, federal workmans comp limited duty capacity, FERS disability retirement, how federal managers define adequate accommodation in the workplace, ill postal workers and lack of viable accommodation plans in the usps, incentives to light duty employees to remain productive, injury compensation and light limited duty, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal accommodation for Postal workers, legal accommodation under fers disability rules, light duty accommodation retirement, light duty and limited duty concepts in the federal workplace, light duty and reasonable accommodation, limited duty and rehab employees in the postal service, limited duty assignments united states postal service, minor job adjustments are not accommodations under fers disability law, nationwide representation of federal employees, one more warning about the 3112a and "accommodation efforts" by your agency employer, OPM disability retirement, owcp accommodations, postal service disability retirement, real accommodation under federal disability retirement law, reasonable accommodation of federal workers, Standard Form 3112D, the disabled federal worker and accommodation issues at the workplace, the perception of accommodation among federal supervisors, the postal service's influence on disability matters through the sf 3112d, the postal supervisor and the sf 3112b, using the legal definition of accommodation in the 3112a, usps accommodation, USPS disability retirement, usps light duty is usually not real accommodation under opm disability rules, usps management reasonable accommodation, what's really legal accommodation under the fers and csrs statues | Leave a comment »