When first entering the adversarial universe of trial lawyers, a kindly but seasoned opposition who easily made foolish mincemeat out of the flustered composite of inexperience and youthful exuberance, but later approached to compliment the young whippersnapper to give some sagely advice: “You have a yellow pad. That is good. You kept looking down at it as if it was a security blanket. That is revealing.
Whenever I see a man with a roadmap, and it is my job to disrupt the travel route from Point A to Point Z, it makes my job easier to make the opposition take some circuitous routes to force the journeying adversary onto more interesting pathways, to make him take in the sights and travel in a zig-zag manner, rather than in the straight line he desires to take.” Point taken.
Revealing too much can have the negative effect of allowing the opposition to know one’s travel route; and if the purpose of one’s mission is to make miserable any goal-tending individual and preventing him or her from attaining a life of unobtrusive quietude (as is often the superficial purpose in life of Supervisors, Managers and other minor dictators who control multiple miniature fiefdoms throughout the Federal and Postal Sectors of employment), then providing an insight into one’s itinerary is like posting a copy of the newly discovered treasure map on Facebook and expecting secrecy because you clicked on a few privacy settings.
It is, indeed, a sad world in which we live; for, if the goal of most is merely to attain an unobtrusive life of quietude, the minimalism of expectation is for each to respect the privacy-space of one another. But perhaps that is asking too much of humanity.
For Federal and Postal employees, whether under FERS or CSRS, who suffer from a medical condition such that the medical condition has interrupted the unobtrusive life of quietude, filing for FERS Disability Retirement benefits through one’s agency (if one is not yet separated from Federal Service, or has been but still within 31 days of such separation) is the administrative requirement. If separated for more than 31 days, then the Federal Disability Retirement application needs to be filed directly with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
In either event, of course, all Federal Disability Retirement applications end up at OPM. But in so doing, timing, the extent of any prefatory information to be revealed to the agency; to whom; for what purpose; and the ultimate question: When? These are all questions and concerns which must be dealt with in a sensitive, thoughtful manner, and particularized to each situation.
Mapping out a strategy on the proverbial yellow pad is an intelligent approach to take; providing a copy of what one has prepared, to whom, when, and to what extent, will determine whether one’s journey is an unobtrusive straight line from point A to point B, or a zig-zagging line of confusions beset with multiple points of disquietude.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: a better methodology to get your opm disability claim approved, a federal attorney's legal methodology and approach, a proven and established methodology to get your fers disability retirement plan approved, a tailored and flexible approach to filing for fers disability, an effective foolproof approach to present and prove a federal disability retirement case on behalf of our clients, applying a tested methodology to your fers disability retirement application, approaching a federal disability retirement with pragmatism is better than the paralyzing anxiety-prone approach, civil service disability retirement, different methodology for lawyers and non-lawyers in opm disability applications, federal disability attorney, federal disability attorneys and their own methodologies, federal disability retirement and when a healthy life of quietude is obstructed, federal employee disability, federal employees with disabilities must know who are their friends and enemies before starting the opm disability retirement process, fers disability retirement methodologies, filing for OPM disability retirement, going to unknown lands require a roadmap and a guide, how to formulate and approach a fers disability application, legal representation for injured federal workers, light duty federal employees versus the opposing adversarial party, medical retirement fers and different methodologies of persuasive argumentation, opm disability is like a chess game: thinking about your enemy's moves ahead of time, postal service disability retirement, pragmatic methodology, procedural opposition to a fers disability application, taking a pragmatic approach to fers disability retirement, the disabled federal employee must know about his/her opposition, the disabled federal employee versus the opposing adversarial party, the methodological approach of the federal agency you will have to deal with, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the opm is not your friend but an opposing party during the federal disability retirement process, the opposing parties during the fers disability retirement process, the right approach when preparing a federal disability retirement packet, the roadmap that will guide your fers disability application to success, when the procedural opposition against the disabled employee materializes, your allies and enemies during the federal disability retirement process | Leave a comment »