Vacuums constitute space devoid of matter. In the practical world, the mechanical tool used for removal of unwanted substances merely moves matter from one location to another; in theoretical physics, one encounters complex conceptual discussions which will often involve comparative analysis of partial vacuums in relation to pure vacuums. Discussions involving vacuums, where a proper context is important in understanding the relational significance of subjects focused upon, and the incomprehensible vacuity of meaningless occurs when conceptual connections are lost because context and substance lose their connective importance.
In the context of filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS or CSRS, too much focus and attention upon peripheral matters, outside of the context of medical conditions in their relationship to positional duties and essential elements of one’s Federal job, will often create a vacuum of significance.
Context is always important; but the extent of detail required, and necessity of issues to be discussed, and the quantitative value of documentation and evidence submitted, may well prove to attain an opposite effect from the one intended. Unintended consequences resulting from intended actions are to be expected in daily life; but where one has decided to pursue an administrative and bureaucratic process where submission of the evidence can be thoughtfully controlled, it is always important to coordinate the relationships between context, content and vacuums. The descriptive context of an OPM Disability Retirement application; the substantive content of the evidence to be submitted; and the vacuum created by placing evidence in one part of the Federal Disability Retirement application but leaving it omitted from another, results in the intended whole of an effective Federal Disability Retirement packet.
All Federal Disability Retirement applications are filed through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, and because the agency which reviews, approves or denies a Federal Disability Retirement claim is different from the one which originates with the source (with the exception of the injured Federal Employee who actually works with OPM, which can of course happen and has happened), it is important to consider the connective relationship between context, content and vacuums created, both in practical life, in theoretical physics, as well as in the preparation, formulation and filing of a CSRS or FERS Disability Retirement application.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application | Tagged: a look at the scope of the pragmatic approach in filing for disability under fers or csrs, a sacred rule in opm disability: submitting documents within context, adding only relevant content in the fers disability application, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, avoid getting distracted with peripheral issues during the federal disability retirement process, avoiding incoherences and contradictions in the language used by the doctor and the applicant, choosing the relevant medical condition to list in your opm disability claim, coherent content and information in the whole fers disability package, consistency of argumentation principles key to success, contextual foundation needed to build upon your fers disability claim, coordinating content and medical information during the fers disability filing, creating a vacuum of significance in the medical application forms you submit to the opm, determining what are really the most important issues in a federal disability retirement claim, disability retirement for federal employees, discerning important from irrelevant medical issues in your opm disability claim, discerning important from peripheral issues in a federal disability retirement case, distractions that peripheral issues can cause to your federal disability retirement application, fers disability legal terms must be used in the proper context, FERS disability retirement, guiding principles to win your fers disability approval, historical context in the sf 3112a, including only relevant information on the fers disability claim, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, maintaining the focus in the most important opm disability issues, making a pragmatic consideration on disability issues, medical condition origin not relevant when filing for fers disability, nationwide representation of federal employees, one coherent federal disability retirement application, owcp disability retirement, peripheral disabilities mentioned in the opm disability retirement application, pursuing a coherent and persuasive federal disability retirement application, representing federal employees from any us government agency, submitting a coherent and consistent opm disability application, the basic principles of federal disability retirement evaluation, the context of your medical condition in the applicant's statements of disability, the history of a medical condition in the proper context of the applicant's statement of disability, the main issues in a federal disability retirement application, the manner and content in a fers or csrs disability retirement application will give a first and lasting impression in the reviewing case worker, the most important issues for fed employees with long-term illnesses, think content even before you file for fers disability retirement, understanding the context of a federal disability application form, using right federal disability terms and concepts in the wrong context, USPS disability retirement, why fers disability retirement is a concept that works within the structure of asymmetrical principles | Leave a comment »