The issue of Agency Accommodations — whether or not an agency can truly “accommodate” an individual; what constitutes a legal accommodation as opposed to temporary light-duty arrangements which do not constitute legally viable accommodations under the standards as expressed in Bracey v. OPM and other cases — keeps coming up in the form of questions and concerns.
Let me just state a few thoughts: First, obviously, the best scenario is if the Agency checks off block 4(a) of SF 3112D, acknowledging that the “medical evidence presented to the agency shows that accommodation is not possible due to the severity of the medical condition and the physical requirements of the position.” Second, however, even if the Agency does not check off 4(a), it is not necessarily a problem, or even a valid concern. Agency Human Resources personnel are notoriously ignorant of the current case-law, and often mistake ad-hoc temporary assignments as constituting an “accommodation”, when in fact they represent no such standard or level of acceptability in disability retirement law. Finally, it is always mindful to remember that disability retirement is a medical issue, not one which is determined by non-medical personnel, and that is why it is important to focus first and foremost upon obtaining a legally sufficient medical narrative report.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Accommodation and Light Duty, OPM Disability Actors - The Agency, OPM Disability Application - SF 3112D Agency Certification of Reassignment and Accommodation Efforts for CSRS and FERS | Tagged: accommodation in federal government, accommodation issues in FERS disability retirement, accommodation of federal employees, ad hoc federal jobs, Bracey v. Office of Personnel Management, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, disability retirement opm legal accommodation, federal owcp, federal disability attorney, federal disability lawyer, federal disability retirement, federal government disability, federal injured ill workers, federal injured workers, FERS disability retirement, filing for OPM disability retirement, form 2499 for light duty in the usps, injured light limited duty supervisor or 204b, legal accommodation for Postal workers, legal accommodation under fers disability rules, light duty, light duty and reasonable accommodation, light duty in the Postal Service, light duty jobs USPS, light-duty job offer, limited duty, limited duty assignments united states postal service, limited jobs for light duty employees, non job related injuries or illnesses, offer of modified assignment (limited duty) ps form 2499x, OPM disabililty application, OPM disability attorney, OPM disability lawyer, OPM disability retirement, owcp accommodations, Postal disability, Postal Service Accommodation Committee, postal service employee light duty forms, postal service layoffs of light duty employees, temporary duties or assignment, what to do when federal agency does not accommodate, when light duty is not longer available to postal workers, when the federal agency is unable to accommodate, when the usps refuses accommodation of employee | 1 Comment »
