If disability retirement were merely a matter of determining the proper diagnosis of a medical condition, and having a doctor ascribe a percentage rating of disability, then the process of disability retirement would substantively be altered, and perhaps there would be far fewer cases to adjudicate at the Merit Systems Protection Board level. For, if the criteria were that ‘cut and dry’, there would be little for OPM and the applicant & the applicant’s lawyer to argue over. However, it rarely is that ‘cut and dry’ — because the major battle is rarely over the diagnosis; it is rarely over an issue concerning a percentage ascription of disability; rather, it is over the symptoms manifested, the significance of such symptoms upon the type of work one does, and in the impact such symptoms have upon the essential elements of one’s job.
That is why descriptive terms are important in disability retirement law. It is not so important ‘what it is’, as opposed to ‘how it is characterized’. From this perspective, it is important for a disability retirement attorney to be more of a poet than to be cold and analytical — although, the best approach would be to have a little bit of both. Remember to always know the context — the applicant will not be standing in front of an OPM representative showing how terrible the applicant’s medical condition is; there will be no visual presentation; everything is based upon a narrative — the applicant’s statement, the medical documentation, the legal memorandum of the attorney, etc. Thus, it is all-important for the attorney who represents a disability retirement applicant to have a good command of the English language.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application, OPM Disability Process, The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney | Tagged: a well-prepared opm disability case, Administrative Law, appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board, are the symptoms more important than the diagnostics?, civil service disability, considering an attorney with experience before the mspb, disability appeal MSPB, disability benefits for federal employees in north dakota, disability retirement benefits for ferc employees, disability retirement facts, disability retirement for federal employees, disabling diagnosis information on narrative report, document preparation and opm disability law, federal disability facts, federal disability law, federal disability lawyer, federal medical retirement, filing for OPM disability retirement, legal & foundational argument, legal for persuasion and argumentation before MSPB hearing, misinterpretation or misapplication of OPM disability law, MSPB and OPM disability retirement, MSPB disability lawyer, OPM clerks, OPM disability retirement, OPM Disability Specialist, OPM Representative, OPM's methodology, physician's statements in an OPM disability case, postal workers owcp rights attorney, pragmatic methodology, reflections on the opm disability process, resources for injured federal workers, the symptoms and the diagnosis in the narrative report, thinking mspb while filing a postal retirement application, USPS Disability, USPS disability retirement, usps medical disability, usps separation disability letter, Waiting for Federal Disability Retirement, what to say during document filing and preparation, when you need to involve the MSPB in disability claim, why a descriptive medical narration is so important |
Leave a Reply