People often ask me whether or not a certain type of medical report should or should not be used. As with almost all such questions, the answer is, “It depends”. On what? On the content; in the manner it is written; and by whom.
This latter basis is often a determinative one. For instance, should a medical report from a Chiropractor be used in an CSRS & FERS Disability Retirement case? Let me answer this question in a circuitous manner — I handled an MSPB case years ago where I had no “medical” doctors testify, but I had two chiropractors testify (I needed both of them, not because two makes better than one, but merely because they treated my client in sequence over the relevant period of time). To the great consternation of the OPM representative, we won the case.
Thus, chiropractors can provide valid medical opinions, and the MSPB has accepted the testimony of chiropractors — as well as therapists — standing alone, without the primary support of a medical doctor. However, my customary approach in the utilization of therapists and chiropractors, as well as physicians’ assistants, nurses, etc., is that they are most effective as secondary support to a primary medical narrative from a medical doctor.
This will often present an interesting conundrum in that, often, chiropractors and therapists will write the more detailed, substantive, and interesting report than the medical doctor. That is okay. To use such reports as a piggy-back upon the short, concise and straightforward medical report is often the best way to use such valuable resources.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Application, Appeals, and Other Medical Documentation Submitted To the OPM, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) | Tagged: arthritis fers disability retirement, attorney for US government employees, avoiding independent or occupational medicine doctors, chiropractor, disability retirement fers, disability retirement from the USPS, disabling diagnosis information on narrative report, doctors report federal disability, doctors to testify in your federal disability case, documentation for medical retirement, federal civilian workers compensation office doctors help, federal employee disability claims and therapist's reports, federal employee medical retirement, federal employee turning over medical evidence to the opm, federal workplace injury, importance of the narrative report on opm disability, importance of your doctor's testimony during MSPB hearing, injured federal workers attorney, legal representation for injured federal workers, letter from doctor to claim federal disability retirement, medical compensation for federal and postal workers, Medical Documentation for OPM Disability Retirement, medical documentation from the chiropractor's office, medical documentation guidelines, medical evidence from other health care specialists, medical reports in the OPM disability retirement application, neurologists narrative for FERS CSRS disability claim, opm csrs retirement, opm disability and physicians statements, opm disability law firm, OPM disability retirement for DEA employees, opm owcp, opm supportive medical documentation, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", owcp medical retirement, physician testimony during the opm disability process, physicians' assistants and federal disability retirement, postal employee needs help with workers comp, postal service disability retirement, postal worker's injury, progressive debilitating condition of postal worker, qualified impairment for opm disability retirement, quality versus quantity on medical documentation, recurrence of owcp condition, relevance over quantity on disability medical documentation, statements from nurses in federal disability compensation cases, support to a physician's medical narrative, types of medical reports used for fers disability, USPS Disability, usps limited duty jobs, usps lwop, usps work injury benefits, what documents should I turn over opm for my disability claim?, writing a narrative report for federal employee patients | 1 Comment »
