Attorneys argue “by analogy” all of the time; cases and decisions from the Merit Systems Protection Board, and language from the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, provide the fertile fodder for such argumentation. Thus, such issues as to whether the Bruner Presumption should apply in the case; whether a case is similar to previously-decided Federal Disability Retirement cases; the similarity of fact-scenarios and legal applications — they are all open to argument by analogy. That is why case-citations are important — even in arguing a Federal Disability Retirement case to the Office of Personnel Management. Whether and how much influence such legal argumentation can have at the first two stages of the disability retirement application process, may be open to dispute; but cases should never be compiled and prepared for the first or second stage alone; all disability retirement applications should be prepared “as if” it will be denied and will be presented on appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board. Such careful preparation serves two (2) purposes: First, for the Office of Personnel Management, to let them know that if they deny it and it goes on appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board, they will have to answer to the scrutiny of the Administrative Law Judge; and Second, for the Administrative Law Judge at the Merit Systems Protection Board, to let him or her know that you did indeed prepare the case well, and that your particular Federal Disability Retirement application conforms to the law, and should therefore be approved.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Federal Disability Judge-Made Decisions Quoted, OPM Disability Actors - The Attorney, The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney, Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: a well-prepared opm disability case, an overall winning approach to the whole opm disability process, argument by analogy, Bruner Presumption, building a strong disability retirement case, building your fers disability foundations over rock, court case decisions opm disability, decisions by the federal circuit court of appeals, disability retirement benefits for air traffic controllers, disability retirement for federal employees, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, federal court decisions in OPM disability cases, federal disability law and legal argumentation, federal disability retirement mspb decisions, federal medical retirement for usaid workers, how to cite a published federal disability case, how to win an OPM disability case, interpretation of court decisions about opm disability, is your case similar to other opm disability court decisions?, legal & foundational argument, legal application of past court opinions, legal argument to support your opm medical incapacity case, legal arguments for opm disability rights, medical retirement for federal employees in south dakota, Merit Systems Protection Board, opm case-law decisions, opm decisions disability, OPM disability application tips, owcp medical retirement, postal service disability retirement, precedent and analogy in opm law legal reasoning, preparing an OPM disability application for the long term, preparing for a long-term federal disability case, resources for injured federal workers, taking a long-term perspective during the filing, the attorney's methodology, the scrutiny of the administrative law judge, thinking mspb while filing a postal retirement application, tips for us government employees on disability retirement, tips on how to handle the opm disability application, using precedents in legal arguments, USPS disability retirement, usps medical disability, why case citations are important |
Leave a Reply