Federal Agencies often act like little fiefdoms. This is not necessarily a negative thing; each agency is an independent entity, and each has a province of responsibilities which it must carry out and execute according to the statutory mandate provided by Congress. As independent entities, each agency acts without coordination or regard to other agencies.
Thus, while approval for disability benefits from the Social Security Administration will mean an offset of monetary payments under FERS, such interaction between the two agencies simply goes to the financial payments — not to the substantive issues of approval or disapproval of a disability retirement claim. Similarly, while receipt of temporary total disability payments from the Office of Worker’s Compensation Programs means that you cannot concurrently receive payments under CSRS or FERS disability retirement (unless you are receiving a scheduled award from OWCP/DOL), the substantive basis of approval or denial of a claim rarely overlaps. This is because each agency has its own independent criteria for eligibility — meaning that, for Social Security, the “disability” has a higher standard of “total disability”, whereas under FERS & CSRS, it is a lower standard of “inability to perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job”. Similarly, with OWCP/DOL, the issue of “causality” and whether it is “work-related” is often the important component of consideration.
All of this is not to say, however, that an approval of a disability benefit from one agency,or a report from a doctor considered for one benefit, should not be used by the applicant for submission to another agency. Indeed, this should be done — but carefully, and with thoughtfulness.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules, FERS Disability, OPM Disability & OWCP Workers Comp Filings, OPM Disability & SSA Social Security Disability Benefits, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) | Tagged: choosing between owcp and federal disability, criterias for disability retirement opm, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, different us agencies have different disability concepts, disability benefits for federal workers in guam, disability retirement for federal employees, fdr and ssdi offset or interaction, federal owcp, federal workers benefits for a non work-related injury, federal workers disability criteria, fers disability and social security disability insurance ssdi, FERS disability retirement, higher "standards" of disability among agencies, mail handler workers comp, no workers comp "retirement" instead opm disability retirement, opm disability and social security eligibility, OPM disability doesn't have to be job-related, opm disability retirement blog, opm medical documents, OPM medical retirement, owcp and opm's independent criteria of eligibility, OWCP benefits for federal workers, OWCP claim, owcp dol, OWCP long term disability, owcp's workers comp and opm disability are mutually exclusive, postal and social security disability, Postal Service workers Comp, proposing separation because of medical incapacity, schedule award, scheduled award and opm disability are not mutually exclusive, Social Security and OPM disability relationship, ssa owcp and opm are agencies independent of each other, statutory criteria for eligibility for disability, statutory mandate of us agencies that provide benefits, total versus partial disability in owcp's and opm's laws, understanding differences between workers comp and opm disability, usps disability benefits, USPS disability retirement, usps medical disability, when excessing light duty from usps then consider disability, workers comp and the "work-related" criteria of eligibility, Workers Comp disability, workers comp is not the only medical benefit for federal workers, workers comp schedule award |
Leave a Reply