There is a line to be drawn between arguing the law within a boundary of integrity, and arguing the law beyond any reasonable interpretation of the law. This principle is no less true in administrative law, which is what Federal Disability Retirement law is considered. I often see non-lawyers make “legal arguments” in an initial application to the Office of Personnel Management, which is then denied, and I then enter my appearance in the case at the Second, Reconsideration Stage of the process. That is fine — some applicants want to try and save the cost of hiring an attorney, and then decide it is necessary after it has been denied.
However, as I often explain to clients: while most mistakes in a Federal Disability Retirement application can be amended or explained, I do not have the magical ability to place “blinders” upon the eyes of the OPM Representative for legal or other arguments or statements made to them at the First Stage of the Process. While my website and my articles & writings provide a good bit of information on filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, and anyone can use it to his or her advantage, one bit of caution: Don’t make legal arguments if you don’t fully know what you are talking about. To do so more often than not results in a loss of credibility, and if your case goes before an Administrative Judge at the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Judge may not look favorably upon a case where a spurious argument was made at the initial stage of the process.
Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Federal Disability Judge-Made Decisions Quoted, OPM Disability Process - 1st Stage: OPM Disability Application, Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: a warning before writing your argument for opm reconsideration stage, appeal reconsideration in cases of medical retirement for federal employees, argumentation and interpretation in opm disability law, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, being careful during self-representation during a federal disability claim, civil service disability, correcting errors made during first stage opm disability process, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, describing your disability argument in plain english, detroit law firm us federal employees with disability, disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement federal workers in san jose ca, disability retirement for federal employees of any us agency, disability retirement medical federal workers in austin tx, federal disability law and legal argumentation, federal disability retirement jacksonville fl, federal medical retirement for indianapolis fed and postal workers, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement law and mistakes that can't be corrected, fixing clients mistakes in an opm disability claim, getting an opm attorney to fix made during the initial application, how an federal disability retirement attorney can help you after first and second denials, if non-lawyers opm reps like to read legal arguments made by non-lawyer applicants, legal arguments from non lawyers, legal interpretation of opm medical retirement law, making mistakes during the opm disability application can cost you months in time, mspb reconsiderations of an opm disability claim, opm disability law and mistakes that can't be corrected, opm disability retirement law firm for columbus ohio fed workers, OPM lawyer, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, postal workers making legal arguments during an opm disability process, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, san francisco opm disability retirement attorney, the applicant's legal arguments, the appropriate factual argumentation in your specific opm disability claim, the non-lawyers' guide to opm disability law, the scrutiny of the mspb administrative judge, trying to save money during initial opm disability application can cost months waiting, using precedents in legal arguments, USPS disability retirement |
Leave a Reply