In proceeding through the administrative and bureaucratic maze of filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS & CSRS, one of the most frustrating encounters is the lack of an ability to concretely “define terms”, such that any disagreement with the Office of Personnel Management can be narrowly curtailed in order to allow for a proper response. It is often contended that 99% of arguments and disagreements are non-substantive. That is, because neither side defines the terms utilized in the argument, each side will argue at cross-purposes, never agreeing because there has been no prefatory attempt at defining the terms which are being used in the first place. If you can, take the opportunity to sit and listen to two people arguing: Are each using terms interchangeably and loosely? Is person A using the terms in the same way and meaning as person B? It is unfortunate that there is never an opportunity to have a “conversation“, in effect, with the Office of Personnel Management, before an Initial Decision is made.
When one looks at an OPM denial, denying an initial Federal or Postal Disability Retirement application, the terms used, the criteria declared, the arguments made (if any), there is never a static point of reference in the terms defined. Ultimately, of course, the point of needing to “define the terms” comes about at the Third Stage of the Process — at the Merit Systems Protection Board, where an Administrative Judge will be an arbiter and (hopefully) finally force a more stable use and definition of terms.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Process - 1st Stage: OPM Disability Application, Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, alexandria va opm disability law firm, annual sick leave or lwop for owcp doctor, argumentation and interpretation in opm disability law, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, blog on civil service disability retirement, civil service disability, communication issues between the opm disability specialist and the applicant's attorney, consistency of argumentation principles key to success, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, dealing with the OPM bureaucracy, denied by opm, disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement for federal employees, disability retirement for federal workers palmdale ca, federal disability law and legal argumentation, federal disability retirement attorney, federal disability retirement lawyer, federal law enforcement disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, FERS medical retirement, hampton va federal disability lawyer, importance of proper legal terms usage in opm disability, importance of using legal argumentation in your fers disability claim, integrity in legal arguments used on behalf of injured postal workers, lack of mutual conceptual knowledge during the opm disability process, lancaster ca opm disability attorney, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal & foundational argument, legal argument to support your opm medical incapacity case, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, logical argumentation in federal disability retirement, making rational arguments along with sound medical evidence, medical retirement from federal government, naperville il medical retirement us government employees, nationwide representation of federal employees, no feedback from the opm before the initial federal disability decision, opm disability negotiation process and argumentation, OPM disability retirement, opm's red tape and slow processing of medical disability applications, owcp retirement, pasadena ca early out postal workers with disability, postal service disability retirement, process for medical retirement from post office, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, retirement disability from the usps, salinas ca federal medical retirement law firm, the use of legal and medical terms during the opm disability process, using similar conceptual terms during the initial opm disability state, USPS disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits, zero accountability in a large federal bureaucratic organization |
Leave a Reply