Repetition is an important tool in any written genre; overuse of the tool can always backfire (is there an inherent conundrum in criticizing the tool of “repetition” by saying that it can be “overused” — probably), but in preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS from the Office of Personnel Management, the importance of repetitively stating the important elements of one’s medical conditions and their impact upon one’s ability/inability to perform the essential elements of one’s job cannot be overstated.
As time is a commodity worth its span in gold, the assigned case worker or Disability Specialist (or whatever other name or designation given to the person at the Office of Personnel Management who will review one’s Federal Disability Retirement application for identification purposes) must use such time efficiently; and given the volume of cases which the Case Worker must evaluate, analyze and decide upon, the tool of repetition is important precisely because, in the short time-span within the volume of cases to be reviewed, the ability to catch the attention of the reviewer and to highlight the main points of one’s case by shouting out in bold-faced screams, is an effective way of presenting one’s case.
As paper-presentations go, they are silent vehicles of communication. However, within the neutral silence of being presented to the reader, it is important to repetitively state (and restate) the main points of a case in formulating one’s narrative in the Applicant’s Statement of Disability. As with everything else, however, in preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS and CSRS, there is a danger point in using the tool of repetition: too much repetition can make one’s case appear to be “artificial” and conniving.
You don’t want to file a Federal Disability Retirement application by stating the Federal Retirement application too repetitively because to overstate the Federal Disability Retirement application too many times would be to use the tool of repetition too much in a Federal Disability Retirement application (hope one gets it).
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: avoiding a conniving opm disability claim, civil service disability retirement, consistency of argumentation principles key to success, disability retirement at the USPS, essential elements of jobs, Federal Disability, federal disability lawyer, federal disability retirement, federal disability retirement tools, federal medical retirement, FERS disability retirement, filing for OPM disability retirement, legal arguments in the federal disability application, legal representation for injured federal workers, legal tools you can use to get your federal disability application approved, medical 'tools' you may use in your usps disability application, medical history of a federal employee, OPM disability retirement, OPM First Stage Disability Application, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, Postal disability retirement, pragmatic methodology, repeating the central theme of a federal disability retirement application, the effective way of presenting one's opm disability case, the human side of a disability story, the repetitive tool in opm disability retirement, the story must be retold but...., the the neutral silence of a paper presentation: the usps disability retirement form, tools a disabled federal employee can use to prove his or her case, USPS Disability, what other tools I can use to prove federal disability retirement eligibility? |
Leave a Reply