In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application with the Office of Personnel Management, it is important to understand the legal criteria of “preponderance of the evidence”, to attempt to meet the legal criteria; to state and argue that the legal criteria has been met, and to reiterate and show how the legal criteria has been met.
Thus, as the Office of Personnel Management is a bureaucracy with multiple levels replete with clerical and administrative staff, it is important to present, to show, to reiterate, and to affirm: the point to get across must be established in a succinct, effective, efficient manner, but it must be firmly established.
“Preponderance of the evidence” can be quite subjective, but within the context of such subjectivity, it encompasses the conceptual analogies of: X is more likely than not; the quantitative weight of the evidence shows that the burden of proof has been met; the qualitative whole has proven that one is entitled to Federal Disability Retirement benefits; the compendium of evidence, both medical and supporting, shows that Mr. Y’s medical condition does indeed prevent him from performing one or more of the essential elements of his job; and similar conclusions to be reached as a result of the entirety of the evidence presented.
Of these analogies noted (which is not meant to be an exhaustive list, but merely an attempt to illustrate the meaning of the concept of “preponderance of the evidence”), the one which is most dangerous for people to embrace, is the “quantitative weight” of evidence. For, ultimately, gathering a thick stack of medical documentation is the easiest way to put together a Federal Disability Retirement application, but the least effective. And in the end, it is effectiveness which we seek, and not ease of completion.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Attorney
Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules | Tagged: applicant preponderance of evidence burden in federal employees, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, civil service disability, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement and the burden of proof concept, is it still difficult to get opm disability retirement with the "more likely than not" legal standard?, legal standards to be met in an opm disability application, opm disability law and the preponderance of evidence concept, opm disability legal standards not explained in opm disability application, opm disability legal sufficiency and proof, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, preponderance of the evidence concept in fers disability law, preponderance of the evidence documents, proof of disability for federal workers, statutory legal standard of disability or impairment, the legal concepts that a federal employee applying for disability should know, things that I must prove in my federal disability retirement application fers, type of legal standard that applies to federal employee disability retirement, using legal standards to win a federal disability claim, USPS disability retirement |
Leave a Reply