It is sometimes asked whether or not other issues which are concurrently and concomitantly filed can, and to what extent, impact the viability of a Federal Disability Retirement application submitted for approval to the Office of Personnel Management.
In order to comprehend such a question, it is important to view the answer from the various perspective of the parties. First, from the viewpoint of the Office of Personnel Management — unless they are specifically made aware of such collateral issues — such peripheral “other issues” would have no bearing upon a Federal Disability Retirement application unless it concerned the potential offset questions of Social Security Disability.
Whether a court filing which concerns a discrimination issue; or an EEOC filing, or perhaps a grievance procedure; all such collateral issues, from the viewpoint of the Office of Personnel Management, would have no relevance. Then, of course, there is the perspective of the “other” forum — perhaps there is an ongoing case at the Merit Systems Protection Board, or with the EEOC, or even a Federal Court case.
Whether, from the “other” forum, there may be an interest as to whether the Federal or Postal employee has filed for Federal Disability Retirement benefits with the Office of Personnel Management, is a question which only the other forum can answer.
If a claim is made in the alternate forum where the requested relief involves getting one’s job back, and at the same time, one has declared by the mere filing of a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS with the Office of Personnel Management, that one is no longer able to perform all of the essential elements of one’s job, then from the “other” perspective, what has been filed with the Office of Personnel Management may be of some interest to the other forum. However, remember that seemingly contradictory concurrent filings are not necessarily negatively viewed, especially if such actions are engaged in order to preserve one’s right to assert a legal standing.
Ultimately, however, it is a rare case indeed that an alternate, concurrent, concomitant filing with another forum has any relevance or impact upon a Federal Disability Retirement application.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, applying for federal disability, collateral issues while on the federal disability retirement application process, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, disability retirement at the USPS, discerning important from peripheral issues in the opm denial letter, distinguish core from collateral issues in a federal disability application, distractions that peripheral issues can cause to your federal disability retirement application, Federal Disability, federal disability attorney, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, important and peripheral medical issues in the fers csrs disability application, interaction between an eeo complaint and an opm case, issues that may affect my fers disability application, mentioning other lawsuits or complaints in the opm disability application, mixing discrimination complaints and medical issues in the usps disability retirement application, nationwide representation of federal employees, offset between social security and opm disability, opm disability and federal discrimination cases, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, pursuing collateral issues besides csrs disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, sometimes you may use collateral issues for your fers disability claim, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, USPS disability retirement benefits, when the opm disability client insists on using peripheral issues |
Leave a Reply