Lawyers are taught — whether at Law School, through observation as a young associate or “apprentice” under the wings of a seasoned attorney — to ask questions in a persistent, methodological manner. Whether in “direct examination” or “cross examination”, the question asked is meant to be goal-oriented.
We often make the mistake, however, in concluding that the question asked constitutes something more than a question — that it contains some substantive value, intrinsic in the very intonation and deliverance of the question itself. The question asked, must be distinguished from the answer given. Thus, the mere fact that a question is asked, does not in and of itself contain any relevant evidence or substantive import. It is in the answer given which must determine the content and context of relevance.
In a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, applied through one’s agency and ultimately submitted to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, multiple and varied questions will be posed, indicated and conveyed to the Federal or Postal employee who is filing for the Federal Disability Retirement benefits. Such questions must be answered — and answered truthfully. The questions themselves, however — whether posed in the Standard Forms which must be completed (SF 3107 & SF 3112 series for the FERS employee; SF 2801 and SF 3112 series for the CSRS employee); or in correspondence form from the Agency or the Office of Personnel Management; or by the Administrative Judge or the OPM Representative at an MSPB Hearing — should have a stream of consistency throughout the process.
This is normally a simple matter — but always remember that “truth” is distinguishable from “consistency”; and it is often the latter which creates some doubt as to the former. Unfortunately, life is very rarely consistent. That is why a coordination and comprehensive outlook upon the entire administrative process, from beginning to end, must always be kept in mind.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney | Tagged: a comprehensive examination upon the entire process, answers and questions in the sf 3112s (fers/csrs disability retirement), attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, being truthful but being careful in what you say, consistency in all the parts of the OPM application package, disability retirement at the USPS, evaluating your federal disability claim for inconsistencies, Federal Disability, federal disability lawyer, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, FERS medical retirement, goal oriented questions in fers disability retirement, legal representation for injured federal workers, opm disability and goal-oriented questions from your lawyer, OPM disability attorney, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, perfect consistency also creates doubt in the form reader's mind, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, questions the fers disability applicant must answer, submitting a coherent and consistent opm disability application, telling the truth about your medical conditions is always the best policy, the difference between consistency and truth in fers disability retirement, truth and consistency across the opm disability retirement forms and statements, USPS disability retirement, when a federal lawyer asks a question... |
Leave a Reply