In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is important to submit material, at each and every turn possible and available, which repetitively and redundantly satisfies each of the legal criteria necessary to meet the eligibility requirements as espoused by the Office of Personnel Management.
Whether it is because the Case Worker at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management does not have the time (because of being overworked) to “read between the lines”, extrapolate or otherwise comprehend the implicit meaning of a statement; or the mechanical application of the “7-part” legal criteria is merely performed by comparing and contrasting the listed legal criteria to the substantive contents of the Federal Disability Retirement application — the reasons for the failure to understand the implicit (and sometimes explicit) import of the statements made are irrelevant.
Thus, for example, one would assume that if a medical narrative report states that the medical condition upon which a Federal Disability Retirement application is based, is considered to be a “permanent” medical condition, then one would implicitly understand that such a statement meets the criteria concerning the requirement that a medical condition must last for a minimum of 12 months in order to meet the eligibility criteria under the law.
However, “permanent” does not necessarily mean (apparently) “lasting for a minimum of 12 months”, and whether the interpretation is somehow lost because the words themselves do not perfectly conform, or because there is some nuance of meanings which only OPM is privileged to comprehend, is an irrelevancy. What is relevant is to meet the legal criteria and the guidelines of the law. As such, make sure and have the medical provider understand that language used must conform to the letter of the law — literally.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Eligibility Criteria | Tagged: applying for federal disability, assuming selective reading comprehension problems during the fers disability form filing, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, civil service disability, disability retirement for federal employees, Federal Disability, federal disability application and the magic words, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, federal disability retirement mantras, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement and the need of perfect redundancy, OPM disability retirement, opm disability retirement "magic words", opm privileged reading comprehension issues, owcp disability retirement, perfect conformity of words recommendation: opm disability application, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, redundancy is not a sin in the federal disability application, repeating the "12 month" mantra in your fers disability application, stating the obvious to an agency with selective reading comprehension problems, the not-so-obvious principle of a good opm disability application, the opm disability application and choosing carefully the right words, the perfect word conformity rule in the opm disability application, USPS disability retirement | Leave a comment »