The problem of relying on “common sense” (as that term is often used and understood) is that such reliance not only reflects a presumption that one possesses that very quality that we deem and recognize as “common sense”, but further, that we assume that we have such sense to realize one possesses it, and additionally, that the person to whom such sense is applied also has it.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the Office of Personnel Management, it is indeed an arbitrary delegation and assignment of one’s case, that the Case Worker would possess that very quality in the process of evaluating, analyzing and reviewing the Federal Disability Retirement application.
Instead, what normally happens is that the OPM Case Worker mechanically applies a sheet containing the “7-part Legal Criteria” and determines whether or not a Federal Disability Retirement application satisfies each of the criteria. But much of Federal Disability Retirement has to do with subtle implications and “reading between the lines” of a medical report, and coming to a “common sense” conclusion by extrapolating and actually analyzing the connection between one’s positional duties and one’s medical conditions, and determining whether or not an inconsistency exists.
Further, when the Bracey decision concerning the concept of “Accommodations” is considered, the issue of inconsistency between a Federal or Postal position and the medical condition can be viewed in a proper light and context, with greater clarity. But to rely upon common sense — both in one’s self, and in someone else — is a dangerous assumption: one which proves the old adage about making a donkey out of you and me.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, application decisions based on experience and not on "common sense", applying common sense to my fers disability application, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, building the ''bridge'' is more important than applying common sense, civil service disability, common sense and opm's 7-part legal criteria, different rules for the opm disability retirement application and process, discretionary decisions based on experience and knowledge of opm disability law, essential elements of jobs, Federal Disability, federal disability lawyer, federal disability retirement, FERS Disability, FERS disability retirement, intuition does not always work in federal disability retirement cases, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal knowledge and core competency of opm disability laws, opm disability and the everybody-has-common-sense theory, OPM disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, pragmatic methodology, the assumption that the opm disability application reader will also have common sense, the federal disability retirement applicant may have common sense but..., USPS disability retirement | Leave a comment »