In approaching how to prove a Federal Disability Retirement case, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is best to try and meet a higher standard of proof, and not be lulled into thinking that because the applicable standard of proof is the lower “preponderance of the evidence” standard, that the mere necessity of proving one’s case is reflective of that standard.
Standards of proof on a theoretical level are for academics; in the practical world of law, one must actually persuade and convince the individuals who are authorized to approve a Federal Disability Retirement application, that the Federal Disability Retirement application merits an approval. This would include the personnel at the Office of Personnel Management, as well as an Administrative Judge at the Merit Systems Protection Board.
One can shout all one wants that the standard of proof needed in a Federal Disability Retirement case is the “preponderance of the evidence,” and that all that is necessary to meet that standard is that X is more likely to be true than not. However, in the “real” world of law, people, and persuasive authority, one’s case should always strive to meet the highest standard — that it is so persuasive that the deciding authority has no choice but to approve the case. For, as the higher standard logically subsumes all lower standards, the inverse is not true, and the interpretation of what constitutes meeting the “preponderance of the evidence” test can have a wide margin of error.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Burden of Proof | Tagged: a federal disability retirement unwritten rule you won't find anywhere in the opm's website, accepting opm disability clients all across america, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, civil service disability retirement, disability retirement for federal employees, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, higher legal standards used by the opm to deny disability retirement, how to prove disability in fers?, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, leaving opm disability theory in the law schools, legal standards invented by the opm to deny benefits, legal standards to be met in an opm disability application, meeting opm's self-imposed higher standards to prove your disability claim, OPM disability retirement, opm disability retirement theory versus practice, opm medical retirement standards, opm's misinterpretation of the legal standard used to approve fers disability retirement, opm's own ''beyond reasonable doubt'' standard application, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, rules you won't find in the instructions of the opm disability retirement application, running the extra mile for the opm, standard of proof applicable to opm disability retirement, the legal and medical standards the opm uses to decide who qualifies for fers disability, the standard of proof, USPS disability retirement, what "standard of proof" applies to fers disability retirement | Leave a comment »