That which is not explicitly stated, may leave room for the listener to infer multiple meanings based upon the implicit statement of the speaker or writer.
Thus, in a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, filed with and obtained through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, it is important to state with explicit redundancy those elements which meet the legal criteria for eligibility for Federal Disability Retirement benefits. X impacts positional element Y. X may impact positional elements Y or Z. X will surely prevent Mr. A from performing some of the essential elements of his job. Of these three statements, which one states unequivocally and explicitly, while the other two allow for inferences which may well result in a denial from the Office of Personnel Management? Obviously, the answer is the first statement, leaving the subsequent two room for inference and implication.
Remember that the Disability, Reconsideration and Appeals “Specialist” at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is specifically targeting a Federal Disability Retirement application for any excuse to deny it. The reviewer will selectively choose any cracks in the aggregate of the disability retirement packet, and where there is room for inference or implication, the language used will be interpreted in the light most favorable to the Office of Personnel Management, to issue a denial in a Federal Disability Retirement case.
Wherever and whenever possible, make explicit that which sounds implicit. The crack of dawn is a time to get up and get things accomplished; a crack in the meaning and usage of language is merely an excuse for misuse and abuse.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, assuming selective reading comprehension problems during the fers disability form filing, avoid giving the opm an excuse or "basis" for denial, civil service disability, condition that prevents to perform the essential functions, disability retirement at the USPS, don't forget about the explicit physical requirements not found in job description, explaining relationship of disability with job performance, explaining the "nexus" as one of the most important issues in the medical report, Federal Disability, federal disability lawyer, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, implicits elements not explicitly described in the job description, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, making sure the statutory requirements are in place and clear in the sf 3112a, making sure you explain what tasks of your job you can't do due to your disability, making the explicit implicit: fers disability application, medical conditions must be explained in plain english for the 3112c, narrowing down OPM excuses for application denial, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, repeating the central theme of a federal disability retirement application, representing federal employees from any us government agency, stating the facts about the essential element of the job, the essential points of a federal disability retirement claim, the medical condition and the essential elements of job connection, USPS disability retirement, what your main job should be: focusing on how your disability affects your federal job performance |
Leave a Reply