Ultimately, in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, one must always remind one’s self that this is a “paper presentation” (regardless of the prevailing and inevitable march towards a paperless society) to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). As such, there are certain inextricable components in the presentation itself, which must be reviewed, evaluated, and decided upon before proceeding.
As a “presentation” which is meant to be persuasive — i.e., proving by a preponderance of the evidence that one is entitled to the Federal Disability Retirement benefit, whether under FERS or CSRS — it must obviously have the essence of the proof itself: Medical Support. Without the medical support, one need not consider moving forward at all.
Once the Federal or Postal employee has ascertained that he or she has the medical support to proceed, then the question is one of obtaining the documentation which confirms such support. For, a pat on the back and a wonderful smile from the doctor will not be persuasive to OPM; the doctor must be willing to document, in detailed format, the support which is expressed.
Next, in sequential order, the medical documentation must reveal, convey, and persuasively reflect, a level of belief which will be tested in the event that the Federal Disability Retirement application is denied at the First Stage of the Process, and further tested if it is denied at the Second, or Reconsideration Stage, of the process. Thus, in short, the treating or supporting doctor must possess a level of belief in one’s case, and be willing to support that belief throughout the entire administrative process.
Finally, the doctor must be able to make a diagnosis, but more than that, to support the diagnosis, and be willing to make the “nexus” between the diagnosis, the patient’s physical, emotional and cognitive capabilities, and to relate them to one’s positional duties of one’s job. It is through this process of connecting the dots, where the end-goal is achieved: of obtaining one’s Federal Disability Retirement benefits.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: applicant preponderance of evidence burden in federal employees, burden of medical documentation to support a federal disability retirement case, compiling additional supporting documentation, compiling medical evidence to support opm disability application, doctor supporting disability fers, ensuring a supportive physician even after opm application, fers disability and the medical docs that will support your story, fers disability application as a paper presentation, finding out if your physician will support your decision to file for opm disability, gathering medical documentation for an incapacitated federal employee, importance of paper presentation in a fers disability claim, medical narrative reports that support a federal employee's claim, opm disability law and the preponderance of evidence concept, opm medical documents, opm supportive medical documentation, physician's support for medical retirement in the federal workplace, preponderance of the evidence documents, the disabled federal worker's supportive physician, the doctor's support for owcp and opm medical claims, the support of a doctor as the most important issue in opm disability, the supportive physician, the the neutral silence of a paper presentation: the usps disability retirement form, the valuable support from your treating physician, time for the doctor to prepare a proper opm medical documentation, using medical documentation from the owcp, usps disability and the support of a doctor to your workers comp claim, usps medical documentation requirements, when the federal employee's physician is ready to support a disability claim, why your doctor's support is critical to your opm disability claim |
OPM Disability Retirement 
Leave a Reply