A veil is an article of clothing which hides part or all of a person. It is worn with the intention of concealing. The history of Western Philosophy, from the time of Plato to the 20th Century writers such as Heidegger, is one encompassing the tension between reality and appearance, of concealment and revelation; in its simplest form, a struggle between truth and falsity.
Studies in psychology have shown how people often see what they desire to see, and self-justification is a force within man’s psyche which allows for actions beyond the moral sphere to be engaged in; for it is man who makes the law, and can provide the linguistic elasticity of rhetorical flourishes in order to abide by them.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is often the case that the Federal or Postal worker has entirely convinced and persuaded him or herself that one’s own Federal Disability Retirement application is “self-evidently” an eligible case. But clearly there is a distinction between an “eligible” case and one of “entitlement”, where the former must be proven, and the latter merely applied for. As to the former, in a Federal Disability Retirement application, one must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that one fits into the latter category.
Remember that a “veil” can do more than one thing — yes, it can conceal, but it can also deceive, and self-deception can be the result of placing a veil over one’s eyes. For, as a veil can conceal from the perspective of the “other”, so it can hinder the viewpoint of the person it conceals.
The necessity of objectivity in preparing and formulating a Federal Disability Retirement application is almost always without question. The fact that the Federal or Postal employee experiences the medical condition is not the basis for an automatic approval from OPM; far from it — it is the ability to prove a case which must be the deciding vehicle of a Federal Disability Retirement case.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Applicant | Tagged: a rational approach to opm disability retirement, an overall winning approach to the whole opm disability process, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, evaluating your own opm disability claim the way an opm disability representative will most likely do it, even easy medical cases must be proved for eligibility in the opm, Federal Disability, federal disability lawyer, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, fers medical retirement lawyer, filling in an opm disability form is easy but getting the benefits is usually not, getting federal worker's disability benefits is not a "slam dunk", how to approach a federal disability retirement case, if only federal disability retirement was a 'piece of cake', looking at your opm disability case with the opm's glasses, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, representing federal employees from any us government agency, slam dunk case in federal disability retirement, taking a wrong approach with your medical fers retirement, the danger of self-deception during federal disability retirement filing, the federal disability applicant's struggle against self-deception, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the need to evaluate your own federal disability retirement case from a more opm-like perspective, the reality of a medical condition affects the way the disabled federal worker sees reality, the stress and pain of your medical condition may also affect the way how you judge the strength of your own federal disability claim, USPS disability retirement, why many disabled federal employees believe that they can get federal disability retirement benefits on the spot | Leave a comment »
