The difference between success and an almost-successful endeavor is normally not based upon the information available, but rather, the effective use of the available information. Just as most “secrets” are neither hidden nor unknown, but rather depend upon who knows it, how it is used, and when it is acquired; similarly, the availability of information disseminated throughout our lives — via the internet, through publications, through media outlets, etc. — is generally not the basis for success. Disparate information compiled in a bulk bound conglomeration is normally not an effective way of presenting something.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is important to go beyond mere compiling of information and data in presenting one’s case to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Remember that Federal Disability Retirement is not an entitlement; rather, it is a benefit which is available upon proving one’s case. Proof of a case depends upon multiple factors: indeed, the Office of Personnel Management will often state the following in denying a Federal Disability Retirement application: “The mere fact that you have a medical condition does not mean that you are eligible for Federal Disability Retirement benefits.”
The existence of a medical condition is a necessary requirement; facts supporting one’s case can be persuasive; the laws governing Federal Disability Retirement and the eligibility criteria should be cited; the nexus between one’s Federal and Postal position and the medical condition should be established; then, beyond each of the disparate informational islands, a coordination of the information is necessary. For that, an approach which involves a paradigm of how one should win a case is important.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire