In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, there is often the question of whether X should be included, or Y should be left out. Whether certain elements, issues, substantive descriptions, etc., should be included, excluded, extracted or otherwise inserted, largely falls into discretionary decision-making; sometimes, however, personal or professional discretion should not be the guiding criteria; rather, the compelling necessity directed by the legal requirements should dictate the decision itself.
Making such decisions often fall into three basic categories: Substantive; ancillary; an admixture of the first and second. Obviously, “which” medical conditions should be included will normally fall into the substantive category; the “history” of the medical condition, the circumstances under which the medical condition came about, and certain medical conditions which one might suffer from, but which have little or no impact upon one’s ability/inability to perform the essential elements of one’s job, might be considered ancillary; and lastly, the admixture of the two — of agency-induced issues which may have resulted in an EEO action; stress-related conditions from a hostile work environment: these must be considered carefully, and should rarely be included in a Federal Disability Retirement application.
Ultimately, the guiding principle should be: Don’t muddy the waters. But the true guide should always be “the law”, and what purports to uphold that which proves by a preponderance of the evidence a Federal Disability Retirement application.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: attorney representing federal employees, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, determining what to include in the fers disability claim package, disability retirement for federal employees, discretionary decisions to submit a good opm disability claim, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, fers disability: discretionary and non-discretionary decision making, history of medical conditions and fers disability retirement, how an opm disability attorney must be able to make discretionary decisions, including only relevant information on the fers disability claim, lawyer federal retirement disability, medical history and federal disability retirement, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm disability and discretionary decision making, OPM disability retirement, Postal disability, questions about discretionary decision-making, representing federal employees from any us government agency, submitting mandatory forms and discretionary documents to the opm, the history of a medical condition in the proper context of the applicant's statement of disability, the importance of explaining your medical historical background in the 3112a, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the necessity of proving preponderance of evidence to win a fers disability claim, USPS disability retirement, what documents to include in your federal disability application packet, what to include in the fers disability application, your opm attorney's discretionary decision making |
Leave a Reply