It is like the story of the man who rushes in breathlessly and declaratively warns others of the impending tornado, and with only minutes to spare, he is stopped and asked, “But will we still be able to watch our evening shows?” The focus upon relevant details; of the “larger picture“; of logical and sequential sets of facts, as opposed to getting irrelevant information correctly stated, is often a problem in writing effectively.
The ability to use discretionary choices in separating factually important descriptions from those which are tertiary at best — will result in having the reader focus upon the essential aspects of one’s presentation, in any context or forum.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, it is vitally important to separate and bifurcate that which is primary in importance, that which is secondarily of relevance, and those factual minutiae which, even if left out, will make little or no difference to the substantive content of a Federal Disability Retirement application.
Often, Federal and Postal employees who suffer from severe psychiatric conditions will unduly focus upon minutiae which, in the context of their medical conditions, are exponentially quantified in magnified importance beyond reason or rationale. One must understand that such is the very nature of the psychiatric condition itself; but recognizing it as such, and trusting in the wise counsel and advice of one’s attorney, is the best first step in making sure that one’s Federal Disability Retirement application will have a fighting chance for an approval.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, determining what are really the most important issues in a federal disability retirement claim, discerning important from peripheral issues in a federal disability retirement case, discretionary decisions to submit a good opm disability claim, distractions that peripheral issues can cause to your federal disability retirement application, Federal Disability, federal disability law blog, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, focusing on medical substantive issues not emotional problems, focusing on the direct issues, getting distracted with peripheral issues, how an opm disability attorney must be able to make discretionary decisions, important and peripheral medical issues in the fers csrs disability application, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, law firm solely focused on their opm disability specialty, maintaining the focus in the most important opm disability issues, narrowing down the most important issues in an opm medical retirement case, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm disability and discretionary decision making, opm disability and focusing on what it really matters: medical issues, OPM disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, questions about discretionary decision-making, stressing the substantive issues in a federal disability retirement application, submitting mandatory forms and discretionary documents to the opm, USPS disability retirement, what your main job should be: focusing on how your disability affects your federal job performance, your opm attorney's discretionary decision making | 2 Comments »