In preparing, formulating, and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, there are multiple discretionary decisions to make. By “discretionary decision“, is meant that there may be differing priorities of values which must be placed in the very process of deciding whether or not to include or exclude a medical document, legal argument, etc., and the prioritizing of the value placed upon such evidence is what will determine the decision itself. There may ultimately be no “correct” decision on the matter, as opposed to an incorrect one.
Further, one may never know (or care, once an approval of a Federal Disability Retirement application is received) whether or not the Office of Personnel Management made a positive or adverse decision on the Federal Disability Retirement application (whichever the case may be at any given stage of the administrative process) based upon the same priority of values assessed upon the decision itself.
For example, sometimes the evidence itself — whether medical or non-medical documentary evidence — may be compelling enough in and of itself, that making a long and tedious legal argument may in fact detract from the prima facie strength of the evidence itself. Or, it may be that a short sentence or annotation in a medical document may be so significant that a particular legal argument, however long and involved that may be, should be stated, and stated at length, and argued boldly.
Discretion dictates a restraining of a reactionary response; sometimes, the shorter the statement, the more effective is the presentation. Length and verbosity alone do not constitute effectiveness in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from OPM.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, citing case-laws may not be necessary when a federal disability case is inherently strong, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, discretion with the opm in handling a federal disability reconsideration, discretionary decisions based on facts and circumstances of your specific case too, Federal Disability, federal disability law and legal argumentation, federal disability retirement, FERS disability retirement, fers disability: discretionary and non-discretionary decision making, how an opm disability attorney must be able to make discretionary decisions, huntsville al federal disability retirement law firm, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, lawyer federal retirement disability, legal argumentation to the administrative judge, legal arguments in the federal disability application, not all legal arguments are always necessary in an opm disability case, objectivity and legal arguments in a fers disability claim, one reason for not citing case law and using too much legal argumentation, OPM disability retirement, Postal disability, questions about discretionary decision-making, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, sometimes the applicant should not have to invoke legal argumentation, studying your opm claim and using appropriate legal arguments, submitting mandatory forms and discretionary documents to the opm, the applicant's and the agency's legal arguments over opm disability, the applicant's legal arguments, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, using legal argumentation in an appropriate and effective way, USPS disability retirement, usps disability retirement blog | Leave a comment »