Ultimately, the “essence” of a thing is defined by a multitude of characteristics; but when a query is made as to what X “is”, as opposed to what it is “not”, the attempt to describe X is almost always rendered inadequate or deficient. It is not enough to say that X is “not A, B or C”, for it may be equally true that Y is also not A, B or C, and yet X is not identical to Y.
When an individual asks the unanswerable question, How does one successfully apply for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management? — the answer cannot be formulated by delineating a list of don’ts (although that may be helpful in a great majority of cases). Rather, the reason why such a question is untenable, aside from being too generalized a question, is that each particular case requires a different and unique set of answers.
Yes, there are general applicability standards which one must follow (i.e., sufficient medical documentation; knowledge of the relevant laws; an understanding of the legal concepts involved, etc.). Yes, there are standard forms to complete (SF 3107 series FERS employees; SF 2801 series for CSRS employees; SF 3112 series for both FERS & CSRS employees) — but how they are completed, and the information provided, must be carefully formulated. How one puts together a Federal Disability Retirement case is just as important in getting at the essence of a Federal Disability Retirement case, than trying to figure out the different components which make up a case.
The “essence” of a thing is a sought-after jewel which has been an ongoing event throughout Western Philosophy, from Plato and Aristotle, to Heidegger and Husserl; it has only been in recent years that such a search has merely turned into a Wittgensteinian language game; and with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, perhaps it is proper that it has become so.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Evaluation Of Your OPM Disability Claim – How Do I Know If I Have A Strong Case? | Tagged: a good medical narrative support is essential for a fers disability retirement application, apwu retirement disability, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, avoid getting distracted with peripheral issues during the federal disability retirement process, choosing the relevant medical condition to list in your opm disability claim, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, describing the central themes of your opm fers disability retirement case, discerning important from irrelevant medical issues in your opm disability claim, essen, explaining the relevance of your medical documents in the cover letter sf 3112, Federal Disability, federal workers compensation disability retirement, going to the essence of a postal disability retirement claim, how does one successfully apply for Federal Employees Disability Retirement benefits (the the unanswerable question), how to apply for federal disability, how to approach a federal disability retirement case, including only relevant information on the fers disability claim, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, narrowing down the most important issues in an opm medical retirement case, nationwide representation of federal employees, only relevant narrative and medical information in the standard form 3112, opm application for disability benefits, owcp disability retirement, paying attention to the essence of a disability retirement case, planning how to approach your federal disability retirement application, postal service disability retirement, relevant, strategists for a good opm disability application, the basis of decision making during the federal disability retirement process, the essential points of a federal disability retirement claim, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the opm disability attorney's faculty of seeing all the relevant medical data, USPS disability retirement benefits |
Leave a Reply