Pain by definition is “subjective”, if by it one means that the experiential verification of the condition is uniquely possessed by the “I”, or the subject of the experience. By contrast, that which is deemed “objective” is presumably validated by more than the possessor of the experiential condition — i.e., by third parties; by testing for the validity and verification of an event through means other than the personal narrative of a singular subject. Yet, if verification of an experience is accepted merely by sheer volume of a collective consensus, then most scientific revolutions in advanced discoveries would never have survived.
In Federal Disability Retirement law, it is often the argument of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management that the Federal or Postal applicant has failed to provide “objective” medical evidence in presenting his or her case. The narrative of having a condition of “chronic pain”, or “severe pain” — being “subjective” by definition — is not deemed “objective“, and therefore cannot be the valid basis alone for a Federal Disability Retirement case (or so the argument by OPM is often presented). Even the results of an MRI will not necessarily satisfy the scrutiny of OPM; for, ultimately, an MRI can only reveal an observable abnormality — not that a person experiences “pain”.
Fortunately, there are a number of cases in law which rebut OPM in their attempt to bifurcate between “objective” and “subjective”, and such legal tools should always be cited and applied in any Federal or Postal Disability Retirement application.
While pain may indeed be subjective by definition, the objectivity of a Federal Disability Retirement application should never be based upon what OPM deems as sufficient; rather, it is the law and the long history of legal guidance by the courts which should mandate how OPM acts. Indeed, if we let OPM’s subjective determinations rule the day, we would all be left in an existential state of pain — one which would then result in a collective consensus which may be deemed objective in nature.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) | Tagged: anxiety caused by physical pain in the federal government workplace, applying for federal disability, attorney help in cases of muscles pain, barriers of credibility and legal subjectivity in your opm disability application, beginning the process or continue with pain and a and progressive deterioration of your health, chronic back pain among postal workers, chronic pain cases in federal disability retirement, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, debilitating back pain in federal employees, describing the true picture of your pain to an opm disability retirement case worker, diffuse pain syndrome among federal workers, federal disability lawyer, how a federal employee's debilitating pain can be proved, if opm disability retirement is possible for chronic pain problems, if the federal employee can not longer withstand daily chronic pain, lack of objective medical evidence used to deny postal disability, looking at ''objective truth" through the eyes of the opm during the fers disability process, lower back pain is a condition that can qualify you for opm disability, maintaining an objective perspective on your fers disability application, objective and subjective factors in your federal disability claim, objective medical evidence for federal disability cases, OPM subjective methodology, opm's objective and subjective federal disability retirement computations, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, postal workers with sciatica nerve pain, presenting a personal disability matter objectively, restoration following injury and pain for federal employment, severe and radiating pain, thoracic discogenic pain syndrome and the federal worker, trying to be objective in a matter considered to be mostly subjective by the office of personnel management, USPS disability retirement, when "objective medical evidence" is not necessary, when the opm refuses to consider ''subjective'' evidence, when the postal employee can't take the pain anymore, working with pain in the federal workplace |
Leave a Reply