In every submission of documentary evidence for a Federal Disability Retirement application, whether under FERS or CSRS, there is the need for discretionary decision-making.
Not every piece of information is relevant or necessary; volume of attachments does not make for sufficiency of substantive content; allowing for certain information to “speak for itself” is often more effective than a long-winded explanatory addendum; and the extent of irrelevant or unimportant information attached or included may well have a decidedly negative impact upon a decision, both in terms of questions raised as to the reason for inclusion of such material, and the detracting nature of such information from the centrality and essence of the submission.
Balance of information is always a consideration. As time is always of importance, so is maintaining the acuity of attention upon the case worker assigned to review, evaluate and decide upon a case. Streamlining; making certain that the focus is always upon the nexus between one’s medical condition and the ability/inability to perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job; and the editorial process of discretionary inclusion of relevant material — these should be the final steps in the formulation and compilation of a Federal Disability Retirement application just prior to submission to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS.
Balance the information — always in favor of relevance, importance, and substantive content. Fluff is best left to descriptive articulation in a fictional genre.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: achieving the right balance in your fers disability application, adding only relevant content in the fers disability application, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, being careful with the medical documentation you submit to opm, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, deciding what medical documentation is relevant to your opm claim, discretionary decision-making on medical reports and documentation submitted to the opm, doctors report federal disability, federal employment disability compensation report, FERS disability retirement, gathering medical documentation for an incapacitated federal employee, getting quality and substantial medical documentation, getting relevant medical documentation key in securing opm disability, including only relevant information on the fers disability claim, internal check and balances in fers medical claims, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, mailing medical reports disability claim, medical documentation guidelines, medical report from treating physicians for fers disability claim, medical reports in the OPM disability retirement application, more about the medical documentation in the fers disability application, nationwide representation of federal employees, only relevant narrative and medical information in the standard form 3112, OPM disability retirement, opm medical documents, opm supportive medical documentation, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, quality versus quantity on medical documentation, relevance over quantity on disability medical documentation, relevant criteria to choose the right medical documentation fers disability, representing federal employees from any us government agency, reviewing and double-checking the medical documents you send to the opm, submitting a balanced and credible medical documentation to the opm, submitting only the most relevant documentation, the opm disability attorney's faculty of seeing all the relevant medical data, the relevant medical information in opm disability, the right balance in your opm disability application, thinking balance, USPS disability retirement, usps medical documentation requirements | Leave a comment »
