Games created and imagined by societies will likely reflect societal values, beliefs, fears, and generally the character and personality of the social structure of the time.
That is why life situations are often described and elaborated upon by reference to particular games, by analogy, to elucidate the reality of a specific situation, or perhaps even the absurdity — because by describing the game, it removes the need to discuss a present reality, and instead to speak of it in terms of a third-person phenomena.
Thus, one might refer to the game of Go — and instruct the novice that, as in life, every time you “pass”, the opponent gains a move, and the more you pass, the greater gains, until victory occurs. Or the oft-quoted game of Chess, in which one must always think in terms of 5 moves ahead, lest your opponent already has mapped out the path to checkmate before you have even considered your options. And so we live life as we play games.
For the Federal or Postal Worker who is considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, such analogies are instructive. “Passing”, as in the game of Go, will only allow the two opponents — the agency, and the medical condition against which one is battling — to gain the upper hand both in terms of time and closing potential options. Failing to consider future moves, as in the game of Chess, will only increasingly limit and restrict one’s future ability to act; and so one’s future is diminished by the enemy of time.
In the end, games are created merely for recreation; but life itself is more than a period of fun and games, and failure to consider the seriousness of an analogy is only to the detriment of he who fails to consider the applicability of parallel universes.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: a successful outcome in fers disability retirement requires planning, accepting opm disability clients all across america, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, board game strategies and the federal disability application and process, care and planning in the preparation of a successful fers disability claim, civil service disability retirement, complex strategies behind simple-looking fers disability forms, different strategies depending on each individual fers disability case, disability retirement for federal employees, federal disability attorney, federal disability retirement, federal service disability retirement application strategies, FERS disability lawyer, fers disability retirement: defeating the opm by playing their own games and under their own rules, future planning before opm disability retirement, gambling with your federal retirement options: if your doctor thinks you won't make it to full retirement, game analogies in federal disability retirement, how agencies master their own language games against the federal employee, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, learning from board games may allow us to win a federal disability retirement battle, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm disability is like a chess game: thinking about your enemy's moves ahead of time, OPM disability retirement, opm disability retirement acceptable construct planning, planning to prepare a successful federal disability application, planning your opm disability strategy from the beginning, playing the opm's game to win your disability benefits, postal personal injury and the rules of the game, representing federal employees in and outside the country, strategies for winning disability retirement for federal employees, the disabled federal employee and the uneven game he or she can't afford to lose, the game federal employees cannot afford to lose, the planning for a game you didn't want to play: fers disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits, viewing federal disability retirement as a board game -- with plans and strategies needed to win |
Leave a Reply