Can one possess good intentions to deceive? Such a paradoxical claim would normally constitute what is commonly referred to as an oxymoron, as the concept of “good” would countermand the opposing construct of deception. Thus, it is not the intention itself which makes for the conundrum, but rather the originating focus of the will to act.
For the Federal and Postal employee who masks one’s medical conditions, whether of a physical nature, a psychiatric condition, or concerning the medications which are prescribed and taken at the direction of one’s medical provider in order to alleviate the symptoms of the condition and perhaps as a palliative measure, the price which one pays for not immediately informing one’s agency may range from nothing, to unforeseen consequences far into the future.
Is it technically “deception” to engage in a negative — i.e., to not immediately inform? Is there an affirmative duty to convey or otherwise divulge such private information, if the medical condition has not yet become so apparent as to openly manifest an impact upon one’s ability to perform all of the essential elements of one’s job?
Conversely, does the supervisor and the agency perform a service of “good” if performance ratings continue to reflect superior or outstanding, when more recent work has clearly diminished in volume and/or quality, but because of past performance and an ongoing sense of loyalty, the supervisor wants to just “sign off” by regurgitating past evaluations and assigning a current date?
Ultimately, in a Federal Disability Retirement case, one must at some point divulge the medical condition, if not merely at the time of filing one’s Federal Disability Retirement application through the agency’s Human Resources Department. The timing of such divulgence, however, can sometimes impact the reactionary impulses of an agency. In the end, the Agency must complete SF 3112D in response to the applicant’s filing; and whether the agency was previously informed or not, an effort to see whether an appropriate accommodation can be made will become an integral part of the process.
From the perspective of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, the issue of timing — of the good or neutral intentions of the applicant — rarely comes into play.
As for any “deception” involved, the only one who would be harmed by any such intention would be the one who bravely attempts to continue working through the pain of the condition itself, and the harm which continues to progressively deteriorate the Federal or Postal employee who attempts to perform all of the essential elements of one’s position.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application | Tagged: advising to exercise prudence with regard to the right timing to inform management about your intentions to file for disability retirement under fers, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, avoiding deception during the federal disability application, choosing the best time to file for federal disability retirement, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, does it make sense to hide your disability from uncle sam?, federal disability attorney, FERS disability retirement, great occupational evaluation reviews before the opm disability retirement application, hiding a disability at work may only work for a while, hiding a medical condition in the federal government workplace, informing the agency about your fers disability application, informing your doctor about the federal disability retirement process, is it wise to let an agency know about your fers disability?, is there any advantage in hiding your medical condition while working for the postal service?, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, letting the agency know about your opm disability application, nationwide representation of federal employees, no reason to hide medical conditions while working for a federal or government agency, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, planning and calculating the best time to let management know about your intentions to seek medical retirement under fers, positive performance reviews in a time where the postal employee is instead trying to prove service deficiency to qualify for usps disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, privacy concerns during the federal disability retirement application and process, privacy of information by the opm, recognizing when it's time to file for federal opm disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, the best time to inform the postal service about your intentions to seek immediate medical retirement, the danger of self-deception during federal disability retirement filing, the deliberate and intentional pursuit of your rights, the federal disability applicant's struggle against self-deception, the often compelling need to hide a medical disability out of fear of discrimination, the question on when to inform the usps about my disability filing, those federal employees who try to hide their pain and suffering with an "everything is fine" mask will only succeed for a while, USPS disability retirement, why some federal employees hide their disabilities at work, why some federal workers feel compelled to hide their medical conditions for career advancement, you know how important is the nexus and you worked hard to prove it in your federal disability retirement application -- but how about your excellent job performance reviews? | Leave a comment »