They can involve actions which result in intended results, or otherwise unintended consequences; or, used in a different way, it may involve a belief or principle, deeply held and fervently committed to, as the impetus and foundation for social or political action. Focus upon “the cause” can be taken to mean a number of things; as in, “Does it benefit the cause?” or, “What was the cause of X?” Used in the former sense, it can lead to blind loyalty to the detriment of one’s own well-being; in the latter, undue focus upon the origin of X can lead one astray, as well.
For the Federal or Postal employee who suffers from a medical condition, such that the medical condition has impacted one’s ability to perform all of the essential elements of one’s job, the issue of “the cause” should be a limited one.
If used in the sense of a principle or deeply-held belief, it can result in an irrational obstacle by pursuing “the cause” as in a need to stay the course, to blindly commit to a false sense of loyalty in order to further the mission of the Federal agency or U.S. Postal Service, at the expense of one’s own health and well-being.
If applied in the more prominent sense of the term — one of causality, fault, origin or resulting-consequences, etc., then it becomes an irrelevant issue. For, unlike Federal Worker’s Comp cases, causality of a medical condition, injury, or medical disability, does not play a role in determining one’s eligibility status in a Federal Disability Retirement application.
For all Federal and Postal Workers, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, must always contend with the former sense of the term, and never the latter.
It is that false sense of being “committed to the cause” which is often the greatest obstacle in considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, and not the inapplicable usage of “cause” as in the origin of one’s medical condition, which remains the pervasive stumbling block for Federal and Postal employees. For, in the end, it is not merely a matter of a linguistic exercise; it is not just whether a person uses or applies a given word properly in the grammatical sense, which has a lasting impact upon individual lives and greater social orders.
We have spouses to correct us if we misuse a word; but when it comes to having a medical condition impacting our ability to continue on in our chosen vocations, a misuse of a word here and there is an inconsequential blunder; what really matters is to have a true and balanced perspective on the important priorities in our lives.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: a practical assessment of your medical condition and your future as a federal employee, an experienced attorney to help disabled postal employees nationwide, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, attorney with experience evaluating many submitted opm disability retirement applications, careful planning from beginning can save you future substantial time, commitment to your federal job at the expense of your well being, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, divorcing your unloyal federal employer due to disabilities: The "I didn't see it coming" reaction, don't expect loyalty from the post office after an accident or illness, expecting bilateral loyalty from your federal employer, experienced federal disability attorney, federal disability retirement - it's all about what's best for you, federal disability retirement and a matter of priorities, federal employee's loyalty towards the us government, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement and the loyalty that never existed, halting the progressive deterioration of a medical condition often begins with a major change of life style, if your health is more important than your job, injured federal employees and pursuing their own priorities, just narrowing your options putting your health always as a priority, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, making a logical determination of what's best for you, medical decision is more important than economic decision, more than a priority a necessity: getting fers disability benefits, not a question of loyalty but a question about the best for you, OPM disability retirement, present decisions that will impact the future well being of the injured postal employee, setting your priorities straight after an injury or illness at the federal level, taking a retrospective viewpoint to evaluate what's best for you in the future, taking action now and thinking about your financial future and well being, the federal worker and the setting of priorities after an illness or injury, the gradual decline of medical conditions and doing what's best for the federal employee, the loyalty of a disabled mail handler toward the Postal Service, the loyalty of a federal agency toward its own employees, the loyalty of the us postal service toward its injured employees, the loyalty towards a federal agency should have its limitations when there is a disability that won't allow the employee to work in an efficient manner, the priority of a federal worker shouldn't be his or her career but his/her wealth and well being, the question of support and loyalty of federal agencies toward their employees with chronic medical conditions, the well being of disabled employees is not usually an issue of mutual concern between employees or supervisors, USPS disability retirement, usps feign loyalty and support toward disabled postal workers, what's more important for the injured postal worker money or good health?, when subtraction of wealth becomes inevitable and one must start all over again for the sake of your health and overall well being | Leave a comment »
