Newspaper stories are replete with articles involving scams, dishonesty and crimes of financial improprieties; that is not surprising, given the nature of what constitutes “newsworthiness”. Fraudulent claims involving disability applications are trumpeted loudly to reveal the disintegration of a system requiring structural integrity. Of course, no one makes the distinction that such claims of fraud almost always involves the “other” disability system, and not the option available to Federal and Postal employees through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS.
Just as all politicians are lumped together, so the aggregation and broad-painted brushing of anyone receiving a “disability” annuity is to be expected. But Federal Disability Retirement is a different animal from the “other” disability system, and with good cause:
First, Federal and Postal employees do not file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits until and unless it becomes a necessary option to take. The general public cannot have it both ways: on the one hand, they complain that Federal and Postal employees have it “easy” with their Federal or Postal jobs; on the other hand, they grumble that receipt of Federal Disability Retirement benefits is taken advantage of by unscrupulous Federal and Postal employees. But if the employment itself is so easy, why would the Federal or Postal Worker take a lesser income by filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits? The fact is that most Federal and Postal employees work hard, and well beyond their rate of compensation, in furthering the mission of their agency or department; and filing for Federal Disability Retirement is the furthest thing from the mindset of a Federal or Postal employee.
Second, because of the reduction of income accorded by an approved Federal Disability Retirement, many Federal and Postal employees must go out and seek employment in the private sector. Yes, they can continue to receive the disability annuity so long as they remain under 80% of what the former Federal or Postal position currently pays; and yes, the combination of both the annuity and the employment income can aggregately comprise more than what the former Federal or Postal position was paying; but that is the very attractiveness and intelligence of the incentivized system. It encourages the Federal and Postal Worker to remain productive, and to “pay back” into the system. In essence, it is a self-paying enterprise.
And, Third, because Federal Disability Retirement recognizes that the disability is tied to a particular kind of job, there is very little room for abuse within the system. One is encouraged to remain productive, and such an incentive allows for the system to remain economically viable.
In these difficult economic times, people are often afraid of considering filing for “disability” benefits; but for Federal and Postal employees who have given their time, life and (often) health in the pursuance of an agency’s mission, being treated like a “suspect” in a broadly-painted indictment is not only unfair, but reprehensible. The Federal and Postal Worker has nothing to be ashamed about, and the fact that the general public may harbor some hidden resentments during these trying economic times, is merely a reflection upon the often petty nature of humanity, and not a true gauge of the work ethic of Federal and Postal employees throughout the country.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: a candid evaluation of your options when your federal employer doesn’t need you anymore after you suffer from an accident or medical condition, a few useful assumptions and realistic expectations before you take the federal disability retirement train, changing paradigms: when federal disability retirement is not a choice but the choice, choices a federal employee with disabilities got to make, considering all the options a federal disability applicant has, coworkers' suspicion of fraud in every federal disability retirement claims, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, dealing with a long road to medical and economic recovery after a disability, disability retirement for federal employees, doctors and their possible bias against injured federal workers, federal disability lawyer, federal disability retirement and this tough economy, federal owcp and fraud charges, federal owcp and your options for the future, federal workers comp and "fraud" charges, fers disability retirement: an option that very often becomes a necessity, FERS medical retirement, filing for disability not a choice but the choice, filing for disability retirement in the midst of a tough economy, filing for OPM disability retirement, from a half-empty to a half-full glass: how disabled federal employees become happier and more optimistic after evaluating the option they have to retire earlier with the office of personnel managemen, if the usps ignores medical problems and terminates you due to "disciplinary" reasons, incentive to work and be useful in opm disability retirement, is early retirement a good deal? not so if you consider other options you may have, legal representation for injured federal workers, not need to feel ashamed or embarrassed when filing for federal disability retirement, OPM disability attorney, owcp disability retirement, shifting paradigms: when we must change and adapt to our new realities, the federal disability retirement progressive paradigm and the pursuing of collective goals for the well-being of all of the individuals, the last option of an injured federal employee, the way the owcp operates: suspicion of fraud always assumed, there is never a reason to feel ashamed for pursuing disability retirement under fers or csrs, usps ''disciplinary'' actions, USPS disability retirement, why opm disability retirement is a progressive paradigm, your life will just start all over again with a new opportunity to be useful and productivity after fers disability retirement |
Leave a Reply