Propriety is not a concept which is much discussed, anymore. That which is socially or morally “proper” has been discarded, precisely because convention is no longer accepted as a standard to follow. But when the consistent pursuance of the opposite of X becomes the acceptable standard, does it not then become the convention itself?
Further, some levels of propriety follow upon the thoughtful order of things, and are imposed not because they are artificial societal creations mandated through a history of traditions; rather, it is so because of common sense. For example, while having a urinal right beside each table in a restaurant may be the most naturally convenient place for utilitarian purposes, the propriety of such placement defies the convention of modesty and privacy concerns; and so it goes.
Sequential propriety is often the best example of logically-imposed events, and failing to follow the linear approach may have unforeseen consequences erupting with problems down the road. Thus, teaching a child to stop, look, listen — then to cross the road, is both logical, of utility, and linear, with a rational foundation for following upon the sequence of actions.
For Federal and Postal employees contemplating the preparation of a Federal Disability Retirement application, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, the propriety of sequential formulation of one’s Federal Disability Retirement application is important before proceeding. When should the Federal or Postal employee’s Statement of Disability be prepared? When should the Supervisor be approached to complete the Supervisor’s Statement? What should be the sequence and priority of listing of the medical conditions which make up the core of one’s Federal Disability Retirement application? Sequence of propriety is often a combination of naturally-imposed events, as well as logically sound determinations.
Throwing out convention is fine for the unthinking; but there have been many a thoughtless child who, like the symbolism in the well-known story of Holden Caulfield, comes too near the edge of a cliff in a field of rye to deserve comfort of thought and actions.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: a better methodology to get your opm disability claim approved, a federal attorney's legal methodology and approach, a logically connected and consistent fers disability application claim, a proven trial-and-error methodology to get you qualified for federal disability retirement under fers or csrs, a tailored and flexible approach to filing for fers disability, an effective foolproof approach to present and prove a federal disability retirement case on behalf of our clients, an effective formulation of a federal disability retirement claim, approving your opm disability retirement with an objective foundation, compiling evidence in a sequential manner, connecting legal standards and sufficiency tests, consistency in all the parts of the OPM application package, disability retirement consequences of self-treatment, establishing key foundations in the initial fers disability application, explaining your case with medical documentation and legal statements in a clear and sequential manner, filing medical retirement forms in a logical sequence, following a linear approach during the federal disability retirement application and process, formulating an almost perfect federal disability application, how to approach a federal disability retirement case, laying the foundation for subsequent federal disability stages, legal foundations for a strong fers disability case, methodology to make your fers disability case more persuasive, planning how to approach your federal disability retirement application, sequential developments of a medical condition in the federal or government workplace, submitting a coherent and consistent opm disability application, taking a pragmatic approach to fers disability retirement, taking into account the sequential approach to filing for disability retirement, the approach and methodology a disabled federal employee needs, the best method to formulate an initial federal disability application, the best way to formulate an usps disability retirement claim, the complex medical and especially legal terminology hiding those connections and definitions you need to prove in a federal disability retirement claim, the imperfect sequence of filing and urgent federal disability retirement claim, the most successful methodology for your federal disability retirement application, the necessary logical connection among documents and medical information among the disability retirement forms, the right approach when preparing a federal disability retirement packet, the sequence of preparing a federal disability retirement application, the sequential and persuasive use of language throughout the federal disability retirement process, using the cogent argument methodology to get your fers disability claim approved | Leave a comment »
