The unique position of the individual in the greater world of objectivity — where the “I” dominates the subjective world but with a recognition that such a peculiar feature of the ego represents an almost insignificant, singular entity in a greater world of objects and other subjects — often results in a duality of opposing and contending, irreconcilable and incommensurable conclusions: the centrality of a unique person, but a necessary and humbling recognition that in comparison to an infinite universe, one is merely a speck of irrelevance.
Bureaucracies tend to do that to a person.
The cold, indifferent and uncaring attitude of systematized control, requiring almost meaningless steps in order to complete a process mandated in order to achieve an end; you are merely a number to account for, in a greater administrative process of files to be audited. For the Federal employee and the U.S. Postal worker who must consider filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS or CSRS, the issue is how best to attempt to reconcile the need to speak about one’s self in the crucial and ever-important Statement of Disability, as required on the bureaucratic form SF 3112A, yet, at the same time convey a sense that “what” is being said is objective, scientific, and medically verifiable.
Too much of the “I” in the Statement of Disability will tend to undermine the validity of the narrative; too little of it, and it is merely a regurgitation of conveying to a disinterested individual, medical facts which fail to compel, persuade and convince. The concept of epistemological privilege is one encompassing the unique privacy of the subjective person. Left within that universe, it fails to reveal the impact of one’s interaction with the greater world.
But in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether one is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset, it is important to recognize that remaining within the insular universe of epistemological privilege, may well undermine the efficacy of one’s Federal Disability Retirement application filed through OPM, and it is crucial, therefore, to recognize the dualism, attempt to strike the proper balance, and consider the weight of the narrative statement one must convey, including bridging the gap between one’s uniqueness in the subjective universe (the “I”), and the impact upon the greater world of objectivity (the description of one’s capacity and ability to perform all of the essential elements of one’s job).
Otherwise, the epistemological privilege will remain just that — lost in a world of subjectivity, and potentially to be rejected by the faceless bureaucrat in a world where you are merely one amongst many.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Applicant | Tagged: a battle worth fighting for and against a very strong and resourceful opponent, applying conventional wisdom to a bureaucratic government process, avoiding pitfalls in your opm disability statements 3112a, being careful with that applicants statement of disability, changes of circumstances requiring a change of role playing: dealing with a huge bureaucratic government institution as a private citizen with urgent medical needs, compensation for injured Homeland Security employees, dealing with the OPM bureaucracy, department of agriculture disability, department of defense agents injured while on duty, Department of Defense Federal Disability Legal Services, department of homeland security medical resignation, disability retirement for usda agriculture employees, DoD Disability Retirement and the Applicant's statement of Disability, explaining truthfully and accurately the nexus in the applicant's statements form, federal disability retirement: fighting for your rights with everything you got, federal owcp and your options for the future, fema employees disability retirement, frustration when dealing with office of personnel management bureaucracy, getting ready to fight the battle to win your disability compensation benefits, getting through the opm bureaucratic process, how best a disabled federal employee should allocate scarce resources, how to handle a superior opponent at the federal disability retirement arena, how your opm disability retirement make it through a bureaucratic process, inability of accommodation for the leo employees, incapacity issues and department of defense employees end of career, injury or occupational disease claim of law enforcement officer (leo), leo disability retirement, limited financial resources during waiting to get approved by opm, medical retirement for department of defense (dod) civilian employees, medical retirement for department of defense (dof) civilian employees, medical retirement for federal leo agents, medical retirement homeland security personnel, online resources and information for the injured federal worker, surviving the opm disability retirement bureaucratic process, the bureaucratic agency with little understanding the disabled postal employee, the bureaucratic maze behind your opm medical application, the evaluating your limited choices now and the realistic expectation of a long battle to fight, time to change hats: when the injured or disabled federal employee becomes another angered private citizen dealing with a huge government institution, unequal arena opponents: the office of personnel management versus the federal disability retirement applicant, voluntary early retirement for department of defense civilian personnel under fers and csrs disability retirement laws |
Leave a Reply