How does one learn it, and if one never recognizes its opposite — inappropriateness — does that then shield one from recognition of its negative consequences? Is it the suddenly silence of the room, the averted eyes of those around, or the pink flush of a blush that suddenly tells of the inappropriateness of what was said, or done? But what of its antonym — do we learn only when someone else says, “Yes, yes, quite appropriate“, and if so, how did that person learn what was or wasn’t?
Is appropriateness merely a human convention, an artificial construct that allows for a mindless continuum that barely retains its relevance beyond the insularity of a self-contained characteristic?
For federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who are considering preparing, formulating and filing an effective Federal Disability Retirement application, whether the Federal employee is under FER05S, CSRS or CSRS Offset, the appropriateness of what to include in a Federal Disability Retirement application, to be filed with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, is often a question of discretion and experience.
What evidence, beyond the obvious medical evidence, can and should be filed? What should be included in one’s Statement of Disability as required on SF 3112A, Applicant’s Statement of Disability? How much personal information, historical facts and background data should be “appropriately” included in the Applicant’s Statement of Disability? Should family members, friends or coworkers provide a statement, as well, and is it “appropriate” to do so?
In the end, appropriateness is a concept that should be tailored by the context of the action, and it might be a good idea to consult with an experienced attorney before preparing, formulating and filing an effective Federal Disability Retirement application, as such a consultation would certainly constitute an appropriateness under the circumstances, and may well be inappropriate to fail to do so.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire