Bringing up the very concept itself implies that the opposite exists: That of “perfect” lives. We perhaps attribute the existence of such; perhaps it is the same line of thought processes which persuades us by the Ontological argument for the existence of God: God is that than which nothing greater can be thought of; To exist is greater than not to exist; therefore, God must by necessity exist. The corollary argument which persuades us of the existence of a “perfect” life would then be: The perfect life is a life which erases all imperfections; perfection is better than its opposite; therefore there must by necessity exist perfect lives.
Yet, does reality indicate the existence of perfect lives? Certainly, its opposite is true: imperfect lives being all around us, including our own, we then assume that there must be other, similarly imperfect lives. Yet, while perfection is a non-relative term (it cannot be dependent upon a comparison to other terms, but is the paragon of all things not imperfect), its antonym — imperfection — can be. Thus, X’s life may be less perfect than Y’s, and Z’s life may be less perfect than Y’s but better than X’s. Can we ever say that X’s life is “more perfect” than X’s or Y’s? Doesn’t “more perfect” necessarily imply imperfection and thus cannot approach a definitional plateau of “more”?
The plain fact is that all of our lives are imperfect, and perfection is an unreachable goal, and perhaps even undefinable. For, who can define perfection of a life which fails to ever meet such a standard, and given the sins of human frailty, can it ever be achieved?
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who suffer from a medical condition such that the medical condition prevents the Federal or Postal worker from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s Federal or Postal position, the time may be ripe to admit and acknowledge that “perfection” is a standard which can never be met, and to try and maintain that appearance of perfection is an unrealistic goal. Medical conditions have a way of humbling us; and as we keep struggling to maintain an appearance of perfection, what we are doing is failing to acknowledge that such a standard is a harmful, detrimental one.
Filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits is an admission of our imperfection; consulting with an attorney who specializes in Federal Disability Retirement Law is a step towards acting upon that admission — that, try as we might, we live imperfect lives, and that’s okay; for, to err is human, and to file for FERS Disability Retirement benefits is to admit to being human.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire