It is one thing to experience pain; quite another, to convey that onto paper. The fiction writer struggles with writer’s block; the ordinary individual (if there is such an entity), the problem is more of self-deception. Because one experiences X, one presumes that others can relate to X as a fellow human being.
Then, of course, there is the problem of proof — of how do you “prove” a subjective content to an objective-requiring audience? Pain is by definition subjective; mental & psychiatric conditions, similarly, are through self-reporting mechanisms.
Yes, there are correlative indicators which help to objectify that which is subjective by nature — consistency in clinical encounters; diagnostic tests which correlate with pain; tests to check for spasms and responsive physical reactions; behavior engaged which is anathema to healthy mental status; and other “tests” which confirm a medical condition of a subjective nature.
Nevertheless, the problem when preparing an effective Federal Disability Retirement application remains: How to move from pain or mental disorder, to paper in order to present a viable Federal or Postal Disability Retirement application to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management under FERS?
Contact and consult with a FERS Disability Retirement Attorney who specializes in Federal Disability Retirement, and take the next necessary steps from pain to paper.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire