The danger of attempting to present a specific viewpoint is that one almost always engages in selective exclusions — sometimes inadvertently; most times, deliberately.
Selective exclusion involves a 2-faced lie: A. You selectively choose to include only those statements, quotations, references, etc., which support your viewpoint and (B) concurrently and in a parallel manner, you exclude those statements which might support or otherwise strength the opposing viewpoint. A third — often unspoken — component implies the following: Truth is not the guide; rather, winning an argument is what prevails.
Now, if a person, entity, organization or agency is supposed to be “objective” about a matter, such deliberative intent to proceed in a biased manner makes it all the more poignantly unacceptable. Yet, that is exactly what the U.S. Office of Personnel Management does when denying a Federal Disability Retirement case — of engaging in selective exclusion in justifying its position of denying a case.
How to rebut and answer such an approach? By including all that was excluded, and arguing the law — which, by the way, OPM also selectively excludes.
Contact an experienced lawyer who specializes in Federal Disability Retirement Law and begin the process of answering the selective exclusion engaged in by OPM.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Lawyer
Postal & Federal Employee Retirement Attorney
OPM Disability Retirement, Et Cetera… 