“Why” evinces a quality of curiosity, and perhaps of disbelief; “who” indicates a need to establish an identity and source; “how” demonstrates a pragmatic approach in determining a future course of action; and “what” reveals the yearning to unravel the foundations of basic principles, as in Aristotle’s methodology in his Metaphysics.
Before the first storyteller or shaman put on a mask to enhance the mysteries of healing and divination; long before the wide-eyed children gathered with the adults around the village center where the bonfire roared with flickering shadows of unknown powers beyond the periphery of the fireflies beaming in the distant darkness of dangers beyond; and well preceding the written account of human history, where anthropology and narrative fantasy melded to provide reminiscences of prehistoric days created in the imaginations of youth, the question of “what” was uttered in innocence.
What is the meaning of X? What happened? What makes a thing become itself? What is the essence of being? Thus for any entrance into a fresh endeavor, the human need for satisfying the “what” of a matter is the prefatory step towards progress.
For the Federal and Postal Worker who is contemplating filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, the initial question might be: What constitutes a “disability”? In that question is the key which often opens wide the conventional confinement which so many people are locked into.
For, in the traditional sense, the focus of the answer to such a question is contained in the definition and diagnosis of a medical condition. For FERS and CSRS Federal Disability Retirement, however, the expansion of the answer goes well beyond the strictures of a diagnosis. It is the nexus, or the connection, between the medical condition and symptoms, on the one hand, and the positional requirements (whether physical, mental or emotional) of one’s Federal or Postal work, which establishes the answer.
Once the Federal and Postal employee gains an understanding of this differentiating concept, then the doors open wide beyond the confinement of OWCP benefits or Social Security Disability benefits. Thus does one approach Federal Disability Retirement with trepidation in asking, What qualifies as a disability? For, contained within the question is the implicit and unspoken answer: such a query already implies a problem, and the problem likely is an impact already being felt upon one’s inability to perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s positional duties of one’s Federal or Postal employment.
As with the first causative rumblings deep in the consciousness of one’s soul, as a child first begins to question the complexity of the universe surrounding the inner self of the “I”, the question uttered alters the relationship between the being of “I” and the objectivity of “others” in a perplexing world of unanswered questions; but in the end, the “what” is a first step, and so it is also for the Federal and Postal employee who is considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether you are under FERS or CSRS.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: a disability in the federal workplace will not alone qualify you for opm disability retirement, a medical condition is not enough to qualify for opm disability retirement, a proven trial-and-error methodology to get you qualified for federal disability retirement under fers or csrs, answering the questions that opm asks about your medical application, apply and qualify for federal employee disability retirement, asking the right question about opm medical retirement, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, common tasks that the federal employee can't do to qualify for disability, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, describing all the symptoms and diagnoses of your medical conditions is something necessary to do but not enough whatsoever to get your opm disability claim approved, differentiating symptoms and conditions in an opm narrative report, disabling diagnosis information on narrative report, doing things right the first time (with the initial federal disability application) will save you bucks and heachaches, explaining the "nexus" as one of the most important issues in the medical report, explaining the symptoms of your medical condition to the opm, federal position description and medical limitations, FERS disability retirement, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, medical conditions v. symptoms in the federal employees disability application, nationwide representation of federal employees, official position descriptions and medical conditions in the fers disability retirement process, one bridge that is necessary to explain: medical conditions and essential elements, opm disability applicants that fail to provide diagnostic test results, owcp disability retirement, plenty of nexus or bridges examples in the sf 3112a, postal service disability retirement, the bridge you must build in your federal employee disability application, the first step a federal employee must take to retire for medical reasons, the nexus between the reality of your illness and job performance must be explained in clear English, the plight of the injured and disabled working in some federal positions, the positional duties that the opm will consider during the fers/csrs disabilty application, the significance of symptoms in fers medical disability, USPS disability retirement, what are the first step in getting opm disability benefits?, what is really important is the nexus of medical condition and job performance, why a formal medical diagnosis doesn't tell the whole story, your medical application has to be based on the nexus and not necessarily on the seriousness of your medical conditions | Leave a comment »