“What Ifs” are hypotheticals which can paralyze a process. Often, such imaginary road blocks are pragmatic irrelevancies, and are better left alone. Others, one should affirmatively confront.
Thus: “What if my Supervisor says…” There are things in one’s control, and those which are not. A Federal Disability Retirement application contains an implicit concept which must not be forgotten: It is actually a Federal Medical Disability Retirement application. What the Supervisor says or doesn’t say is not ultimately relevant. Can the Supervisor’s Statement have an influence or impact? Obviously. But it is not one of those things which should be worried about, because it is beyond anyone’s control — for the most part.
“What if my doctor won’t support my case?” This is a hypothetical which one has control over, in filing for Federal Medical Disability Retirement benefits. As such, one should make an appointment with the doctor before starting the process, or even contemplating starting the process, and have a frank discussion with the doctor. Bifurcate those issues which one has control over, from those which one does not. In filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, one needs to confront the reality of today, in preparation for tomorrow’s future.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: a doctor's comments are more important than a supervisor's comments in an opm claim, civil service disability, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, deciding what medical documentation is relevant to your opm claim, ensuring a supportive physician even after opm application, ethical issues when filing the 3112b form, federal disability retirement is primarily a medical issue, fers disability application supervisor comments, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, focusing on the main medical issues of your illnesses or injuries, getting the medical support you need for your federal disability case, how to seek the support of your treating doctor, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, neutralizing negative statements from supervisor's statements in sf 3112b, OPM disability lawyer, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, remembering that opm disability retirement is primarily a medical issue, representing federal employees from any us government agency, should I find another physician to support my opm claim?, super, supervisors' revenge against Postal workers, the 3112c form, the doctor's support for owcp and opm medical claims, the limited power of a supervisor in the fers disability retirement process, the most and the least important actors fers disability retirement, the relevant medical information in opm disability, the supportive physician, trying to change things you have some control over, usps disability and the support of a doctor to your workers comp claim, USPS disability retirement, usps form 3112c, why the sf 3112b matters less than the doctor's statements, why your doctor's support is critical to your opm disability claim, worrying about keeping your doctor on your side under workers comp, worrying about things out of your control | Leave a comment »
The Physicians and the Substance of a Federal Disability Retirement Case
Ultimately, the essence of any claim, endeavor, vocation or activity possesses a characteristic “essence” of a matter — that which defines itself, reveals its core value, and manifests the substantive content of what X “is” as opposed to the accidental and peripheral appearances which can throw one off from the central enigma of that which we seek to unravel.
That is the defining history of Western Philosophy; it is what Plato began in inquiring about the differences between Forms and appearances; what Aristotle did in rolling his sleeves up and getting down to the serious work of scientifically approaching the world through observation and keen perspective; and in more modern times, it is encapsulated by the work of Heidegger, who viewed every being as an encounter to unmask in the experiential sequel learned from his master, Edmund Husserl and the school of phenomenology.
The History of Philosophy has since been one of loss of stature, as all of the subsciences have taken on their prominent roles and fractured apart from the umbrella of philosophy. Psychology, Anthropology, Physics, Theology — they have all found and formed their own mouthpieces.
Medicine and the physicians who represent the discipline of the medical community have a unique and enduring perspective; it has now become defined by an approach of pharmacology and surgery, prompting alternative movements of holistic endeavors. But until a time in a distant future which accepts “other” approaches, it is the physician with an “M.D.”, “D.O.”, or other such designation, which will be necessary in the acceptable community of opinions and judgments. Yes, Chiropractic care, Physical Therapists, Nurse Practitioners, Psychologists and LCSWs can help to prove a case; but the central focus of authoritative acceptance still comes primarily from that guy or girl who went to “medical school”.
For the Federal and Postal employee who seeks to obtain Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, the core of one’s case must be based upon a view towards the examiner, reviewer, or “Administrative Specialist” as designated by OPM, and what that individual will accept as the authoritative basis of a viable Federal Disability Retirement case. This is a world where the word of the physician is paramount; and those in the communities of subsets can certainly lend authoritative support; but it is always a mistake to confuse the outpost for the headquarters.
In a viable OPM Disability Retirement application, it is important to obtain the opinion and support of that which will provide the essence of authoritative support, to the greatest extent possible. What opinion to seek; how the narrative opinion is characterized; who provides it; and what the substantive content will state — all will make a difference in preparing and formulating a Federal Disability Retirement application, and its proper presentation to the authorities at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
While the “enemy” may attack and destroy the perimeters and outposts, until the neurological center of an organism is defeated, all such efforts are destined to fail.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Doctor | Tagged: a doctor's comments are more important than a supervisor's comments in an opm claim, a good medical narrative support is essential for a fers disability retirement application, advising your treating doctor about your opm disability application, an effective narrative presentation for my opm disability claim, approaching a physician with the 3112C in your hand, arming your doctors for the federal disability battle, can I use the reports of a physical therapist or a chiropractor for my fers disability case?, consistency physician statement work medical release opm, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, dealing with the doctor after a disability in the workplace of the federal government, doctor supporting disability fers, don't undermine the role of your family doctor during the fers disability process, enlisting the help of a licensed clinical social worker (lcsw) for my own federal disability case, federal employee disability claims and therapist's reports, fers disability and the medical narrative report, FERS disability retirement, I need help deciding what to do with my fers disability claim, is it possible to use a psychologist for his/her medical reports regarding a federal disability-based retirement?, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, medical conditions must be explained in plain english for the 3112c, medical documentation from the chiropractor's office, medical evaluation from primary treating physician, narrative example of fers disability retirement, narrative medical reports used in the federal disability retirement process, nationwide representation of federal employees, nurse practitioners and federal disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, primary documentation in a fers disability claim should ideally come from the treating physician, statements from nurses in federal disability compensation cases, stress claims and psychologist's reports for your fers medical claim, the essence of a federal disability case, the family doctor as a guardian angel during the opm disabiity process, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the opm disability claim and the treating doctor you know best, the way doctors view your medical conditions and write a narrative is important for an opm disability claim, using a nurse practitioner's statements in support to your fdr case, using chiropractors for your federal disability retirement application, what other health professionals can help in a postal or federal disability cases?, why is so important the medical narrative of the federal employee, writing a persuasively descriptive narrative for opm disability | Leave a comment »