At what point does a house of cards collapse, when based upon assumptions and presumptions? The words are used interchangeably; the slight conceptual distinctions may be of irrelevant import to justify differentiation. One can perhaps quibble that assumptions point more toward the conclusory stage of an argument, whereas presumptions often involve the prefatory issues in a logical sequence of argumentation.
Both engage suppositions not based upon “facts”; and, of course, there is the problematic issue of what constitutes facts, as opposed to mere assertions of events and opinions derived from such facts and events; with the further compounding and confounding task of sifting through what was witnessed, what was thought to have been observed, when, who, the intersection between memory, event, and sequence of occurrences, etc.
Presumably (here we go using the very word which we are writing about, which is rather presumptuous to begin with), Bishop Berkeley would have allowed for either and both to be used in order to maneuver through the world without bumping into chairs and tables which, for him, were mere perceptual constructs in the subjective universe of “ideas” in the heads of individuals. And Hume, for all of his logical deconstructionism concerning the lack of a “necessary connection” between cause and effect, would assume that, in the commonplace physical world we occupy, presumptions are necessary in order to begin the chain of sequential events. Waking up and walking down the stairs to get a cup of coffee, one need not wait for the necessary connection between thought and act in order to begin the day.
For Federal and Postal employees who are considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, proceeding through the administrative morass of one’s agency and ultimately into the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, based upon the dual deterrents of assumptions and presumptions, can be a harrowing experience. It is not the factual basis which defeats a Federal Disability Retirement application filed with OPM; rather, it is always the baseless presumptions and assumptions which kill the successful outcome.
Medical facts must be established; narrative facts about the impact upon one’s inability to perform the essential elements of one’s job can be asserted; but it is always the connective presumptions and unintended assumptions which complicate and confuse. Always remember that a narrative based purely upon presumptions and assumptions cannot possibly exist without the concrete adhesives of some foundational facts; like a house of cards, it waits merely for the gods of chance to blow a puff of unforeseen breath to topple the structure that was built without an adequate foundation.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Miscellaneous | Tagged: a good medical narrative support is essential for a fers disability retirement application, a strong and solid foundation for your fers disability retirement case: high quality and a relative quantity of medical evidence, additional documents a federal disability applicant may use as part of evidence in a federal disability retirement claim, applicant preponderance of evidence burden in federal employees, building a strong case before filing for disability benefits with the office of personnel management, building a strong foundation on rock before the perfect storm, building your fers disability foundations over rock, compiling medical evidence to support opm disability application, connecti, emphasizing quality in submitting opm medical records, empirical evidence on opm disability claims, evidence needed to get my fers disability application approved, explaining how your medical condition affects the quality of your work as a federal employee, explaining preponderance of evidence under fers disability retirement law, getting more medical evidence after an opm denial - is doing so enough?, getting quality and substantial medical documentation, help building the pillars that will support a strong federal disability retirement case, legal foundations for a strong fers disability case, legal opm disability terms and presumptions, preparing for a strong fers disability case, prevailing wrong assumptions about federal disability retirement, the appropriate factual argumentation in your specific opm disability claim, the assumption that the opm disability application reader will also have common sense, the connection between disabilities and hostile work environments in the federal workplace, the light duty employee and building your foundations in solid rock, the nature of your medical conditions determines the quality and quantity of the medical documentation needed to win a case, the right perspective and legitimate assumptions when filling out fers/csrs disability retirement forms, using only reliable information for the basis of your decision making during the opm disability process, weight of evidence fers disability retirement, what supportive documentation or evidence really means under opm disability law, wrong assumptions that will spell disaster after submitting an original federal disability retirement application, your own decision after observing how your illness affects the speed and quality of your work in the federal workplace | Leave a comment »
The Physicians and the Substance of a Federal Disability Retirement Case
Ultimately, the essence of any claim, endeavor, vocation or activity possesses a characteristic “essence” of a matter — that which defines itself, reveals its core value, and manifests the substantive content of what X “is” as opposed to the accidental and peripheral appearances which can throw one off from the central enigma of that which we seek to unravel.
That is the defining history of Western Philosophy; it is what Plato began in inquiring about the differences between Forms and appearances; what Aristotle did in rolling his sleeves up and getting down to the serious work of scientifically approaching the world through observation and keen perspective; and in more modern times, it is encapsulated by the work of Heidegger, who viewed every being as an encounter to unmask in the experiential sequel learned from his master, Edmund Husserl and the school of phenomenology.
The History of Philosophy has since been one of loss of stature, as all of the subsciences have taken on their prominent roles and fractured apart from the umbrella of philosophy. Psychology, Anthropology, Physics, Theology — they have all found and formed their own mouthpieces.
Medicine and the physicians who represent the discipline of the medical community have a unique and enduring perspective; it has now become defined by an approach of pharmacology and surgery, prompting alternative movements of holistic endeavors. But until a time in a distant future which accepts “other” approaches, it is the physician with an “M.D.”, “D.O.”, or other such designation, which will be necessary in the acceptable community of opinions and judgments. Yes, Chiropractic care, Physical Therapists, Nurse Practitioners, Psychologists and LCSWs can help to prove a case; but the central focus of authoritative acceptance still comes primarily from that guy or girl who went to “medical school”.
For the Federal and Postal employee who seeks to obtain Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, the core of one’s case must be based upon a view towards the examiner, reviewer, or “Administrative Specialist” as designated by OPM, and what that individual will accept as the authoritative basis of a viable Federal Disability Retirement case. This is a world where the word of the physician is paramount; and those in the communities of subsets can certainly lend authoritative support; but it is always a mistake to confuse the outpost for the headquarters.
In a viable OPM Disability Retirement application, it is important to obtain the opinion and support of that which will provide the essence of authoritative support, to the greatest extent possible. What opinion to seek; how the narrative opinion is characterized; who provides it; and what the substantive content will state — all will make a difference in preparing and formulating a Federal Disability Retirement application, and its proper presentation to the authorities at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
While the “enemy” may attack and destroy the perimeters and outposts, until the neurological center of an organism is defeated, all such efforts are destined to fail.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Doctor | Tagged: a doctor's comments are more important than a supervisor's comments in an opm claim, a good medical narrative support is essential for a fers disability retirement application, advising your treating doctor about your opm disability application, an effective narrative presentation for my opm disability claim, approaching a physician with the 3112C in your hand, arming your doctors for the federal disability battle, can I use the reports of a physical therapist or a chiropractor for my fers disability case?, consistency physician statement work medical release opm, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, dealing with the doctor after a disability in the workplace of the federal government, doctor supporting disability fers, don't undermine the role of your family doctor during the fers disability process, enlisting the help of a licensed clinical social worker (lcsw) for my own federal disability case, federal employee disability claims and therapist's reports, fers disability and the medical narrative report, FERS disability retirement, I need help deciding what to do with my fers disability claim, is it possible to use a psychologist for his/her medical reports regarding a federal disability-based retirement?, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, medical conditions must be explained in plain english for the 3112c, medical documentation from the chiropractor's office, medical evaluation from primary treating physician, narrative example of fers disability retirement, narrative medical reports used in the federal disability retirement process, nationwide representation of federal employees, nurse practitioners and federal disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, primary documentation in a fers disability claim should ideally come from the treating physician, statements from nurses in federal disability compensation cases, stress claims and psychologist's reports for your fers medical claim, the essence of a federal disability case, the family doctor as a guardian angel during the opm disabiity process, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the opm disability claim and the treating doctor you know best, the way doctors view your medical conditions and write a narrative is important for an opm disability claim, using a nurse practitioner's statements in support to your fdr case, using chiropractors for your federal disability retirement application, what other health professionals can help in a postal or federal disability cases?, why is so important the medical narrative of the federal employee, writing a persuasively descriptive narrative for opm disability | Leave a comment »