The ability to expunge, extinguish or recant is only available to the extent that memory serves us well; for, as the last veteran of a war once fought follows to a grave avoided in the skirmishes and battles long forgotten, so the discarding of memorialized narratives will survive long past, or be placed upon the dusty shelves of books unread and periodicals unsealed.
Human memory itself, of course, is fickle and fraught with errors of judgment and contextual intermingling of past vestiges, present impressions and future anticipatory angst of what should be; thus do short stories and novels of Dickensian genres magnify the perspective from a child’s memory of slights and wrongs committed. It is when the written form is completed, that we are locked into the truth or falsity of an otherwise remembered past.
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who prepare, formulate and file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, the narrative Statement of Disability as propounded, explicated and sealed on SF 3112A becomes the foundation of one’s application. For that is where the facts, figures and featured fellowship between one’s medical condition, the work one engages in, and the nexus between the two will determine the evaluative force and analytical judgment of the Administrative Specialist at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset.
Once the Federal Disability Retirement application is submitted to Boyers, Pennsylvania, and a CSA Number is assigned, the content of the narrative statement is accepted and ensconced in stone; medical conditions cannot be “added”, but they can follow the course of substantive inclusion; and nor can the narrative be recanted, despite differing memories diverging from the written Statement of Disability as submitted to OPM on SF 3112A.
As such, one must take care in the preparation, formulation and filing of an OPM Disability Retirement application, for the narrative recanted must be withdrawn, but the residue of past submissions may remain in copied form in the unforgiving files of a bureaucracy which never discards anything, even unto the dustbin of history.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application - SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS and FERS, Uncategorized | Tagged: 3112a applicant's statement of disability, an effective narrative presentation for my opm disability claim, Applicant's Statement of Disability for FERS, attorney for disabled federal technician, being careful with what you right in the applicant's statement of disability, can a federal employee be terminated due to a medical condition? yes! call atty first time free consultation to know your rights, dealing with inaccurate information on standard form 3112d with an attorney a board, department of defense bulling of agent and investigation employees, disability grievance letter in usps jobs, dod civilian medical disability retirement, eeoc medical discrimination are often harder to prove than opm medical retirement claims, fed gov employment light duty accommodation failing, federal bureau of prisons disability retirement, federal employee bullying case of anxiety and depression, federal employee narrative opm sf 3112a form, federal employment resignation form for disabling conditions, federal form opm 71 and disability retirement, fers attorney serving nyc area physical conditions in the federal employee opm attorney, fers disability retirement due to mental illness, fers disability retirement lawyer serving philadelphia area, fers medical retirement opm attorney, formulating the applicant's narrative, homeland security supervisors bullying causing stress, how to start a reconsideration of a fers disability denial? ask atty first time free consultation, I received a proposed letter of medical removal now what, l3-l4 to l5-s1 discogenic federal employee, lawyer blog on how to get approved for fers medical retirement, letter carrier retirement for medical reasons, long term stress leave lawyer fers employee, medical resignation federal service, medical retirement complaints to owcp dol, medical retirement from federal government, medical retirement system standard form 3112 a, medically retiring from federal service, mental stress early retirement federal employment, merit systems protection board medical retirement, miami dade residents help from fers disability attorney, opm bullying in the workplace, OPM disability retirement, opm disability retirement application, opm disability retirement packet, opm filing hostile workplace stress claim, owcp fired from job can owcp still terminate benefits? yes consider filing for opm disability retirement, owcp opm disability accepted conditions legal counseling, pennsylvania fers medical retirement attorney, postal employee removed for medical inability to perform, quitting federal service and filing for medical retirement, resigning from the post office due mental condition, sf 3112 disability application package legal assistance, sf 3112 disability form help, sf 3112 disability retirement forms help, sf 3112a examples or legarl assistance, sleep apnea disability claim and retirement from federal government employment, standard form 3112 for disability, stress leave government employee, the end goal of an opm medical retirement attorney, the important role of a fers disability retirement attorney, u.s. postal service disability program lawyer, usps disability retirement process and sick leave, usps form 50 personnel action against disabled employee, usps how to resign medical incapacities, usps opm csrs early medical retirement guidelines, va employee disability retirement benefits, workman's comp wants me to get a second opinion what’s next? | Leave a comment »
The Physicians and the Substance of a Federal Disability Retirement Case
Ultimately, the essence of any claim, endeavor, vocation or activity possesses a characteristic “essence” of a matter — that which defines itself, reveals its core value, and manifests the substantive content of what X “is” as opposed to the accidental and peripheral appearances which can throw one off from the central enigma of that which we seek to unravel.
That is the defining history of Western Philosophy; it is what Plato began in inquiring about the differences between Forms and appearances; what Aristotle did in rolling his sleeves up and getting down to the serious work of scientifically approaching the world through observation and keen perspective; and in more modern times, it is encapsulated by the work of Heidegger, who viewed every being as an encounter to unmask in the experiential sequel learned from his master, Edmund Husserl and the school of phenomenology.
The History of Philosophy has since been one of loss of stature, as all of the subsciences have taken on their prominent roles and fractured apart from the umbrella of philosophy. Psychology, Anthropology, Physics, Theology — they have all found and formed their own mouthpieces.
Medicine and the physicians who represent the discipline of the medical community have a unique and enduring perspective; it has now become defined by an approach of pharmacology and surgery, prompting alternative movements of holistic endeavors. But until a time in a distant future which accepts “other” approaches, it is the physician with an “M.D.”, “D.O.”, or other such designation, which will be necessary in the acceptable community of opinions and judgments. Yes, Chiropractic care, Physical Therapists, Nurse Practitioners, Psychologists and LCSWs can help to prove a case; but the central focus of authoritative acceptance still comes primarily from that guy or girl who went to “medical school”.
For the Federal and Postal employee who seeks to obtain Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, the core of one’s case must be based upon a view towards the examiner, reviewer, or “Administrative Specialist” as designated by OPM, and what that individual will accept as the authoritative basis of a viable Federal Disability Retirement case. This is a world where the word of the physician is paramount; and those in the communities of subsets can certainly lend authoritative support; but it is always a mistake to confuse the outpost for the headquarters.
In a viable OPM Disability Retirement application, it is important to obtain the opinion and support of that which will provide the essence of authoritative support, to the greatest extent possible. What opinion to seek; how the narrative opinion is characterized; who provides it; and what the substantive content will state — all will make a difference in preparing and formulating a Federal Disability Retirement application, and its proper presentation to the authorities at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
While the “enemy” may attack and destroy the perimeters and outposts, until the neurological center of an organism is defeated, all such efforts are destined to fail.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Doctor | Tagged: a doctor's comments are more important than a supervisor's comments in an opm claim, a good medical narrative support is essential for a fers disability retirement application, advising your treating doctor about your opm disability application, an effective narrative presentation for my opm disability claim, approaching a physician with the 3112C in your hand, arming your doctors for the federal disability battle, can I use the reports of a physical therapist or a chiropractor for my fers disability case?, consistency physician statement work medical release opm, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, dealing with the doctor after a disability in the workplace of the federal government, doctor supporting disability fers, don't undermine the role of your family doctor during the fers disability process, enlisting the help of a licensed clinical social worker (lcsw) for my own federal disability case, federal employee disability claims and therapist's reports, fers disability and the medical narrative report, FERS disability retirement, I need help deciding what to do with my fers disability claim, is it possible to use a psychologist for his/her medical reports regarding a federal disability-based retirement?, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, medical conditions must be explained in plain english for the 3112c, medical documentation from the chiropractor's office, medical evaluation from primary treating physician, narrative example of fers disability retirement, narrative medical reports used in the federal disability retirement process, nationwide representation of federal employees, nurse practitioners and federal disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, primary documentation in a fers disability claim should ideally come from the treating physician, statements from nurses in federal disability compensation cases, stress claims and psychologist's reports for your fers medical claim, the essence of a federal disability case, the family doctor as a guardian angel during the opm disabiity process, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the opm disability claim and the treating doctor you know best, the way doctors view your medical conditions and write a narrative is important for an opm disability claim, using a nurse practitioner's statements in support to your fdr case, using chiropractors for your federal disability retirement application, what other health professionals can help in a postal or federal disability cases?, why is so important the medical narrative of the federal employee, writing a persuasively descriptive narrative for opm disability | Leave a comment »