Perhaps it is an inevitability. When a Federal employee or a U.S. Postal worker suffers from a medical condition, such that the medical condition begins to impact one or more of the essential elements of one’s job, the reaction of the agency for whom he or she works (or the U.S. Postal Service), is often one of lack of supportive behaviors, to propose an understatement. Reacting to a reactionary response, however, is not always the intelligent thing to do.
When the Federal employee or the U.S. Postal Service recognizes a need to file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal employee or the U.S. Postal worker is under FERS or CSRS, the natural and instinctive thing to do is to reference the hostile work environment in one’s Statement of Disability (SF 3112A), thinking that statements about, and references to, an agency which has further exacerbated the severity and extent of one’s medical condition, will help to further the cause of attaining an approval for a Federal Disability Retirement application from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Such a strategy, however, may well backfire, and one needs to be cautious in approaching the formulation of one’s Statement of Disability when consideration is given to including information concerning circumstances which may constitute a hostile work environment.
Relevant facts are always helpful; helpful facts are often necessary; and sufficiency of facts is always necessary. However, in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from OPM, discretion is the better part of valor, and that is especially true when submitting a Federal or Postal Medical Retirement application to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability and a Hostile Working Environment | Tagged: a hostile work environment and federal disability retirement, a hostile work environment in the federal government can create stress and other mental issues, an emotional vs. reasoned personal account of disability, attorney experienced in dealing with fers disability retirement claims, avoiding using the "hostile environment" term in your opm disability claim, barriers of credibility and legal subjectivity in your opm disability application, bullying postal supervisor and the injured federal employee, cases where the opm claims situational disability, credibility in your fers disability application, department of defense and disability retirement, discrimination against us government employees, discrimination and indifference against federal employees with medical conditions, eeoc federal employee disability claims, emotional issues are understandable but don't let them ruin your application, employees from the department of veterans affairs resigning due to stress, equal opportunity issues and federal disability claims, escaping the vicious cycle of dependency from working in a hostile work environment, establishing the credibility of your fers or csrs disability application, fed government hostile working environment, federal employee stress leave and the hostile work environment in the mail processing centers, federal government stress leave, federal law agents and mental and psychological stress, fers resignation from a hostile environment and intolerable working conditions, harassment and bullying by federal government supervisors, harassment without accountability at the USPS, hostile environment at work opm, hostile work environment in the postal service, hostile working conditions in the federal government workplace, hostility against disabled employees in the department of homeland security, hostility against disabled federal employees, information credibility on opm disability information, legal representation before the office of personnel management (opm), nationwide representation of federal employees, one easy reason the opm can use to deny your disability claim, opm definition of hostile work environment and situational disability, opm disability for stress is possible just don't make it situational, opm hostile work environment, owcp stress, owcp stress claims and opm disability retirement when working in a workplace with hostile conditions, postal service stress leave, resign over harassment and discrimination issues in the post office, stress in the postal service, stress leave usps, submitting a balanced and credible medical documentation to the opm, the dangers of getting your opm claim situational, the handling a hostile work environment with federal supervisors, the hostile work environment in postal distribution centers, the hostile work environment in the federal government, The Importance of Your Credibility in an OPM Disability Application, the revenge of a postal supervisor, using your credibility in the applicant's statement of the opm disability form, usps hostile work environment, usps stress leave, what makes a hostile work environment in federal agencies and why is there so much hostility against disabled federal employees, when personal emotions overtake rational thoughts during application process, when postal supervisors create a hostile work environment for disabled employees, when the federal employee feels like resigning because of the stress and hostile work environment, when there is discrimination and harassment in the department of the treasury against federal employees with medical conditions, why it's not a good idea to talk about discrimination and hostile work environment in a federal disability retirement narrative, working in a hostile work environment in the department of the justice, your credibility on the federal disability application | Leave a comment »
Federal & Postal Service Disability Retirement: Personal v. Objective
Filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits is a personal matter. It is personal precisely because it is considered as an admission of a disability; it goes to the heart of what a person does in life — one’s livelihood, one’s means of support; and it goes to the perception in our society of the “worth” of an individual — financial worth, productive worth, worth in terms of the ability to support a family, and worth in terms of one’s contribution to society. Because it is so personal, it is difficult to “objectively” assess and evaluate a disability retirement claim, by the individual who is thinking about filing for such a benefit.
That is often why it is important to have an attorney represent an individual who is considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits. Often, when I am hired at the second or third Stage of the process, I read the initial submissions of the client, and find that the “personal” has indeed overtaken the “objective”, precisely because the very subject of the disability retirement process — the applicant — had to undertake the very personal process himself/herself. Such personal subjectivity cannot see beyond the very personal nature of the medical condition, and when that happens, it is almost too personal for the OPM representative to make an objective assessment of the case.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Applicant, OPM Disability Actors - The Attorney, OPM Disability Process - 1st Stage: OPM Disability Application, The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney | Tagged: a rational approach to opm disability retirement, an emotional vs. reasoned personal account of disability, an objective evaluation of your opm disability claim, attorney federal disability, blogs owcp and opm disability issues, civil service disability retirement, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, describing a medical tragedy without too much emotionalism, disability retirement in the post office, emotional comments won't always help to get opm application approved, federal civil service disability, federal employee and its acceptance of being disabled, federal employee disability, federal employee disability benefits, federal employee medical retirement, FERS disability retirement, FERS medical retirement, fighting feelings of worthlessness during the opm disability application, filing for usps disability, focusing on medical substantive issues not emotional problems, getting rid of emotional baggage during fers disability application, helping the opm disability specialist to evaluate your claim objectively, helping the opm representative to assess your disability claim, how to get approved for federal employee disability benefits, keeping emotions under control will help an opm disability applicant, keeping your tone cool and rational during application, Maintaining an Objective Perspective in a Disability Case, making rational arguments along with sound medical evidence, no work available for injured postal workers, not getting too personal during the applicant's statement of disability, nrp and defending injured postal workers, OPM disability retirement, OPM objective methodology, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", postal service disability retirement, presenting a personal disability matter objectively, problems with personal disability retirement statements in opm application, rational perspective into the fed workers' medical condition, story of human tragedy, taking lwop for owcp medical condition, the fine balance between rational and emotional factors, the human side of a disability story, top federal disability retirement attorney, us post office disability attorney, usps rehab employees, value of a human being not defined by disabilities, when personal emotions overtake rational thoughts during application process, when the opm applicant can't handle the disability paperwork, why it can be difficult for the opm disability applicant to prove his claim | Leave a comment »