A Federal or Postal employee who is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS may also be undergoing concurrent disciplinary proceedings, or engaged in corollary grievances, EEO Complaints, or involved in a lawsuit in a separate forum, either in the Federal Circuit Courts or at the Merit Systems Protection Board.
In either event, the question often comes to the fore as to whether such collateral issues should be brought up in the Applicant’s Statement of Disability (SF 3112A) or perhaps in a legal memorandum or cover letter which argues the merits of the case, the legal basis for eligibility, etc. The answer to the question as to whether, how and where is one of discretionary choice, and there is never a singular answer.
A separate question to be asked of one’s self (with no obvious answer) is whether or not, if the applicant who is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS does not bring up the fact of a collateral issue being litigated in a separate forum, will the Agency bring it up and discuss it in a way detrimental to the Applicant, and further, will the fact that the issues was not brought up make it appear as if the Applicant is somehow trying to hide the issue? As with all such hypotheticals, the answer to all of the above is: It all depends…
Often, not mentioning a potential “red flag” until and unless it becomes a red flag is the best approach. Sometimes, making a passing reference to the collateral issue may be appropriate. In all instances, unless a connection can be made between the collateral issue and the issues central to a Federal Disability Retirement application — the medical basis and the impact upon one’s medical inability to perform the essential elements of one’s job — it is normally best to leave it alone. In any case, such discretionary decisions should be made with the advice of an attorney.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: application of a structured and fair legal process in federal disability retirement, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, collateral issues while on the federal disability retirement application process, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, discerning important from peripheral issues in the opm denial letter, disciplinary actions for medical conditions against federal workers, discretionary decisions to submit a good opm disability claim, distinguish core from collateral issues in a federal disability application, fers disability and conflicting legal processes, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement eligibility issues, focusing on the direct issues, giving the opm red flags to deny your disability claim, how an opm disability attorney must be able to make discretionary decisions, how to best approach a fers disability case, if you should even mention your eeoc lawsuit during the opm disability application, important and peripheral medical issues in the fers csrs disability application, issues that the opm disability applicant must avoid most of the times, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal processes impacts on the opm disability claim, opm disability and a legal process that invites confusion, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, peripheral disabilities mentioned in the opm disability retirement application, post disability application issues, questions about discretionary decision-making, removing a federal employee for discipline, representing federal employees from any us government agency, the attorney's role during the opm disability process, the best approach to prepare a successful opm disability application, USPS disability retirement, what issues to avoid emphasizing during an opm claim, when a opm claim contradicts another legal process, when other legal processes come in conflict with your fers disability application, when to mention a collateral issue during the sf 3112 preparation, when you have other legal processes besides opm disability | Leave a comment »