At what point is the sufficiency test satisfied? Who determines when the bathtub is full enough in order to bathe? What constitutes the threshold of being gluttonous on Thanksgiving, as opposed to having had a hearty meal? And, for a FERS or CSRS Disability Retirement application, what standard determines whether or not a person has submitted evidence sufficient to meet the preponderance of the evidence test, in order to persuade the U.S. Office of Personnel Management that a Federal Disability Retirement application has met its burden, and that the Federal or Postal employee is therefore eligible and entitled to receive an approval and a subsequent annuity?
Clearly, it cannot be mere volume of medical reports and records; for, otherwise, cases with barely a dozen pages of a report, diagnostic test results and some office notes would not pass through the scrutiny of the OPM Caseworker. If not volume, then is it the quality of the report and records? Here, too, while a well-documented file may generally meet the sufficiency test, there are times when OPM will insist upon treatment notes for the past 18 – 24 months before considering a case for approval.
The sufficiency test is often an admixture of quality, quantity, and a compendium of selectively highlighted documentation which, in their totality, prove an OPM Federal Disability Retirement case. There are no two cases alike, though similarities may abound. Each case must be seen in its own unique light, and within that context, a case must be carefully constructed and compiled. Only in this manner and approach will the sufficiency test be met, and only after a careful and thorough review of the facts, issues and particular uniqueness of a given case — somewhat in a reflectively similar manner as OPM will do in reviewing the submitted case.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Burden of Proof | Tagged: a candid evaluation of your work performance and how your medical condition affects it, a rational perspective from your disability claim evaluation, an objective evaluation of your opm disability claim, applicant preponderance of evidence burden in federal employees, applying the sufficient documentation test to a standard in an opm disability retirement case, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, civil service disability, connecting legal standards and sufficiency tests, considering what is really important for the opm during the application evaluation, disability retirement at the USPS, each disability retirement case is complex when evaluating all needed variables, each federal disability application is unique and should be pre-evaluated for its viability, evaluat, evaluating how strong your federal disability retirement case with the adequacy and sufficiency tests, expecting unrepresented claimants to bear the burden of presenting a compelling case, experience to evaluate a well prepared fers disability application, federal disability attorney, FERS disability retirement, functional abilities evaluation for federal employees, having a medical condition is not sufficient to qualify for opm disability, how to avoid the owcp's "insufficient medical documentation" excuse, how to figure out if the answers you submitted to the disability retirement application questions and the medical documentation you enclosed in the medical disability package will be at least theoreti, knowing what constitutes adequacy and sufficiency of evidence in federal disability retirement theory will help you to assess better if your claim is strong enough to pass opm own sets of scrutiny tes, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal sufficiency test, meeting all of the critical elements and the opm's legal burden of proof, meeting the burden of eligibility requirements for medical retirement under fers, nationwide representation of federal employees, opm disability legal sufficiency and proof, owcp disability retirement, sufficiency-of-evidence test in fers disability retirement, sufficient medical evidence disability fers, the legal insufficient test in federal disability retirement, The not-sufficient but all-necessary preparation to apply for OPM Disability benefits, the quantity and quality controls of a subjective assessment to determine if a particular package of medical documentation is sufficient to meet the opm-imposed higher legal standard of review, using the right standard before applying the "insufficient" excuse, USPS disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits, what's the burden of proof under fers disability retirement law?, why an adequacy test may not be sufficient to assess if a particular federal disability retirement case or claim is particularly strong enough to file with enough faith and confidence | Leave a comment »
OPM Disability Retirement Help: Different Standards
To overdress is almost always acceptable; to underdress — well, while it may be acceptable, you may have to endure being the subject of curiosity and quiet whispers of raised eyebrows.
There are different standards for every occasion, endeavor, event or engagement; some high, others low; a few enforced without exception while still maintaining a sense of decorum and the rest of them left to ignored apathy where anything goes. Some private clubs seem to thrive upon the exclusivity of standards maintained so high that few can meet the exceptionalism applied, while those more accessible to the public allow for flagrant violations with nary a nod or a wink.
It is when the context becomes the content that eyebrows become raised, and the higher the brow the more exclusive the thinking. For the rebel, it is always difficult to try and convey the notion that one must adapt and change with the circumstances — that standards are applied, and you must recognize those standards and act accordingly.
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who suffer from a medical condition such that the standards set have now failed to be met — whether at the personal level or the professional — it might be time to consider filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset.
Whether through a recognition of the standards set for yourself — which is often higher than what is acceptable by others — or because you are beginning to get the hints that your agency or the Postal Facility has become dissatisfied with your work performance, your attendance or excessive use of sick leave; whatever the reason, the plain fact is that the medical condition itself is always the basis for determining the need to alter and modify one’s personal and professional standard.
Don’t be too hard on yourself. The standard you used to apply before the onset of a medical condition should not be the same one that is applied to your present situation, and you should therefore consider that the standard of maintaining one’s health is the present priority exclusively, no matter what your Federal Agency or your Postal Facility tries to have you believe.
Consult with an attorney who specializes in Federal Disability Retirement Law, and determine whether you “meet the standards” to apply for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. They may be different than what you think.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: applying the sufficient documentation test to a standard in an opm disability retirement case, awol for medical reasons federal employment, biased disability reasonable accommodation committee in post office and what my options are, blog information from fers attorney end of federal employment for disabled us postal workers, dealing with supervisors negative comments on request for fers disability retirement, different laws and standards of disability, disability leave for postal employees, disciplinary actions and disabilities discrimination fers attorney, disciplinary actions for awol medical leave fers lawyer, excessive sick leave postal employee lawyer, federal employee fers disability for crohns disease, fers benefits if resign for physical or mental impairments, fers opm attorney expert on the usps long term disability application process, fers retirement for stress and depression, fers retirement form 3107 disabling conditions, forced fers medical retirement by us postal service, getting permanent benefits when you have a partial disability which won’t allow you to work in the federal government with efficiency, hiring an attorney excessive sick leave federal employee, how to apply for postal medical retirement benefits, how to resign from a civilian dod position for medical disabilities, how to resign from the postal service if I have a disabling condition, if a postal employee on owcp doesn’t expect to recover from an illness or long term injury, improper standard opm disability retirement, law blog on tips to complete sf 3112 attorney for federal employees, legal standards to be met in an opm disability application, limited duty mail handler with back injury, mail carrier postal employment light duty, opm disability retirement tsa employee, opm disciplined for using excessive sick leave, opm medical retirement filing after resignation from federal employment (be careful there is one year limit only), partial disability benefits federal worker, postal clerk with repetitive type of injuries, postal service letter to sign for disabilities, postal sf 3112 disability application package, qualifying for a disability retirement under opm fers, question to attorney McGill: how long do you have to work to qualify for civil service retirement, recovering from arthritis after employment in the u.s. post office, requesting advance long term leave for postal mail handler, resignation and medical retirement with usps medical retirement attorney, separation from federal employment medical inability to perform position chores, statutory legal standard of disability or impairment, stress traffic control medical retirement lawyer, top fers disability attorney serving now fers disability cranberry pa employees and surrounding areas, tsa.gov transportation security administration medical retirement attorney, us postal service shared services private attorney light duty, watch out for the federal employee medical retirement 80% rule, when sedentary postal positions for light duty won’t work, when there is an unfair termination of federal employee with cognitive limitations contact best fers employee advocate, workers comp with usps long term sickness | Leave a comment »