Physicians are peculiar animals. They are here to help; and from their perspective, success is measured in terms of how rarely a patient returns for further care. The ultimate sentence of failure is to conclude that nothing further can be done for an individual, and one must therefore declare that the patient is permanently disabled.
For the Federal or Postal employee contemplating filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, such a perspective on the part of the physician is important before approaching the treating doctor with a request for a medical report. That is why the SF 3112C is such an ineffective vehicle of communication.
Consider this: SF 3112C is a government-prepared form; it is formulated by Federal bureaucrats; the language merely proposes generic guidelines concerning what is required — without any amendments or consideration of case-law refinements which have been promulgated over the evolution of Federal Disability Retirement laws over these many years.
Perhaps more importantly, however, is the lack of bedside manners in handing to a physician a standard form. While many physicians themselves lack adequate bedside manners, it is the epitome of bad form to thrust a pre-printed form (no pun intended) under the nose of a physician who is supposed to be treating and taking care of you, and to declaratively order, “Fill this out”. Even an addendum of “please” will not adequately modify such an affront.
The physician-patient relationship is one based upon communication, knowledge, personal sharing, and a good bit of explaining. Taking the time to prepare a physician is the least one should do in preparing for an effective Federal Disability Retirement application.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Doctor | Tagged: a personal medical report or just filling out the sf 3112c, a rational perspective from your disability claim evaluation, alternative to using 3112c in federal disability application, approaching a physician with the 3112C in your hand, asking a doctor to do an administrative task for you, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, avoiding the 3112c and using a medical narrative instead, civil service disability retirement, disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement for federal employees, doctor and patient relationship, explaining relationship of disability with job performance, federal disability attorney, federal disability law blog, federal disability lawyer, federal disability retirement, federal employee disability, federal employee disability doctor, FERS disability retirement, fers disability retirement and the doctor with good ''bedside manners'', filing a medical release form in disguise: 3112c, instead of using the sf 3112c...., law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM Disability and the Ideal Doctor and Patient Relationship, OPM disability attorney, opm disability forms, OPM disability lawyer, OPM disability retirement, opm release of approval information, owcp disability retirement, perspe, physician's statements in an OPM disability case, Post Office disability, representing federal employees in and outside the country, SF 3112C Physician's Statement, the compelling description of physical incapacity, the importance of the personal relationship of the treating doctor in fers disability claims, the opm disability application from the perspective of your physician, understanding a doctor's perspective when he or she declares you disabled, USPS Disability, viewing your federal disability claim from the perspective of your physician, Why not to submit an SF 3112C, why you should not release all your medical information to opm, your treating doctors | Leave a comment »
The Physicians and the Substance of a Federal Disability Retirement Case
Ultimately, the essence of any claim, endeavor, vocation or activity possesses a characteristic “essence” of a matter — that which defines itself, reveals its core value, and manifests the substantive content of what X “is” as opposed to the accidental and peripheral appearances which can throw one off from the central enigma of that which we seek to unravel.
That is the defining history of Western Philosophy; it is what Plato began in inquiring about the differences between Forms and appearances; what Aristotle did in rolling his sleeves up and getting down to the serious work of scientifically approaching the world through observation and keen perspective; and in more modern times, it is encapsulated by the work of Heidegger, who viewed every being as an encounter to unmask in the experiential sequel learned from his master, Edmund Husserl and the school of phenomenology.
The History of Philosophy has since been one of loss of stature, as all of the subsciences have taken on their prominent roles and fractured apart from the umbrella of philosophy. Psychology, Anthropology, Physics, Theology — they have all found and formed their own mouthpieces.
Medicine and the physicians who represent the discipline of the medical community have a unique and enduring perspective; it has now become defined by an approach of pharmacology and surgery, prompting alternative movements of holistic endeavors. But until a time in a distant future which accepts “other” approaches, it is the physician with an “M.D.”, “D.O.”, or other such designation, which will be necessary in the acceptable community of opinions and judgments. Yes, Chiropractic care, Physical Therapists, Nurse Practitioners, Psychologists and LCSWs can help to prove a case; but the central focus of authoritative acceptance still comes primarily from that guy or girl who went to “medical school”.
For the Federal and Postal employee who seeks to obtain Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, the core of one’s case must be based upon a view towards the examiner, reviewer, or “Administrative Specialist” as designated by OPM, and what that individual will accept as the authoritative basis of a viable Federal Disability Retirement case. This is a world where the word of the physician is paramount; and those in the communities of subsets can certainly lend authoritative support; but it is always a mistake to confuse the outpost for the headquarters.
In a viable OPM Disability Retirement application, it is important to obtain the opinion and support of that which will provide the essence of authoritative support, to the greatest extent possible. What opinion to seek; how the narrative opinion is characterized; who provides it; and what the substantive content will state — all will make a difference in preparing and formulating a Federal Disability Retirement application, and its proper presentation to the authorities at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
While the “enemy” may attack and destroy the perimeters and outposts, until the neurological center of an organism is defeated, all such efforts are destined to fail.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Doctor | Tagged: a doctor's comments are more important than a supervisor's comments in an opm claim, a good medical narrative support is essential for a fers disability retirement application, advising your treating doctor about your opm disability application, an effective narrative presentation for my opm disability claim, approaching a physician with the 3112C in your hand, arming your doctors for the federal disability battle, can I use the reports of a physical therapist or a chiropractor for my fers disability case?, consistency physician statement work medical release opm, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, dealing with the doctor after a disability in the workplace of the federal government, doctor supporting disability fers, don't undermine the role of your family doctor during the fers disability process, enlisting the help of a licensed clinical social worker (lcsw) for my own federal disability case, federal employee disability claims and therapist's reports, fers disability and the medical narrative report, FERS disability retirement, I need help deciding what to do with my fers disability claim, is it possible to use a psychologist for his/her medical reports regarding a federal disability-based retirement?, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, medical conditions must be explained in plain english for the 3112c, medical documentation from the chiropractor's office, medical evaluation from primary treating physician, narrative example of fers disability retirement, narrative medical reports used in the federal disability retirement process, nationwide representation of federal employees, nurse practitioners and federal disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, primary documentation in a fers disability claim should ideally come from the treating physician, statements from nurses in federal disability compensation cases, stress claims and psychologist's reports for your fers medical claim, the essence of a federal disability case, the family doctor as a guardian angel during the opm disabiity process, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the opm disability claim and the treating doctor you know best, the way doctors view your medical conditions and write a narrative is important for an opm disability claim, using a nurse practitioner's statements in support to your fdr case, using chiropractors for your federal disability retirement application, what other health professionals can help in a postal or federal disability cases?, why is so important the medical narrative of the federal employee, writing a persuasively descriptive narrative for opm disability | Leave a comment »