OPM ignores the law. Despite over a decade since the opinion expressed in Reilly v. OPM, Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, 571 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2009), the U.S. Office of Personnel Management continues to dismiss the relevance of post-separation medical evidence in a Federal or Postal Disability Retirement application.
OPM will systematically deny cases with the following type of statement: “You doctor stated X. However, the medical report was dated after your separation from Federal Service. Therefore, you did not establish that you were medically disabled from performing your job while a Federal employee.” Huh?
Three things stand out, of course: First, most medical conditions are progressive and degenerative in nature and do not appear on the very day a doctor examines a patient.
Second, the clear logical error of OPM’s argument is so blatant: X exists. X exists after Time-Y. Therefore, because X exists after Time-Y, X did not exist prior to Time-Y. Or: I saw a man named Tom. I saw Tom today and did not see him yesterday. Therefore, Tom was not born before I saw him today. Absurd.
And third: OPM ignores the law as stated in Reilly, where post-separation medical evidence is clearly relevant if a proper nexus is established to a pre-separation time-frame.
Don’t let OPM’s illogical interpretation of the law defeat you. Contact an attorney who specializes in Federal Disability Retirement, and beat them back in order to obtain the benefits you are entitled to.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Resigning or Being Separated From a Federal Agency for Medical Problems or Other Reasons, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) | Tagged: a balanced fers medical retirement application, a story of medical turmoil in each fers medical retirement application, advanced sick leave or fers medical retirement, adverse action from post office attorney, benefits fers retirement for incapacity, dickinson county mich. federal government employee disability retirement attorney, feca postal medical retirement for u.s. mail carrier, federal employee turning over medical evidence to the opm, federal prison employee opm medical retirement, filing for postal medical retirement, good judgement and counseling from your federal disability lawyer, homeland security employee in virginia info on opm medical retirement, how to file for fers medical incapacity retirement, how to qualify for fers disability retirement, ill and injured fers government employees, immediate retirement for injuries for fers employees, information on attorney dealing with fers disability retirement benefits, injured off work fers employee, injury compensation for long term incapacity for fers government employee, law consultation about postal medical retirement benefits, legal consultation for postal medical retirement cases, legal consultation postal medical retirement lawyer, letter carrier postal medical retirement, long term healing when postal medical retirement, medical evidence in opm disability claim, more information about postal medical retirement benefits, office of personnel management (opm) medical retirement, opm medical retirement virginia, pittsburg county okla. fers civilian government employee opm medical retirement, preston county w. va government employee disability retirement, Sylvia M. Reilly v. OPM, texas federal government employee’s disability retirement benefits, the Reilly case and what it means for future federal applicants, trial fers lawyer, unable to work due to disabilities and fers medical retirement lawyer, veteran affairs employee with disability retirement, when your medical condition won’t heal consider postal medical retirement, williamson county federal government employee medical retirement lawyer, workman’s compensation early out medical retirement homeland security fers disability retirement lawyer | Leave a comment »